My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11982
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:16 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:25:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/21/1996
Doc Name
BOWIE RESOURSES LTD BOWIE 2 MINE PN C-96-083
From
JE STOVER & ASSOCIATES
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />David Berry -11- June 20, 1996 <br />47. An annotation of culvert C-F1 was added to Map 20, <br />Sedimentation Control Plan. Enclosed is revised Map 20. <br />48. The DMG's comments about its general guidelines for erosive <br />velocities is noted. <br />49. Annotations for culverts D-F1 and D-F2 were added to Map 20, <br />Sedimentation Control Plan. Enclosed is revised Map 20. <br />50. The data for ditches D-D1, D-D2, D-E1, D-F1 and D-F2 was added <br />to the V-Ditch Design table found on enclosed page Exh-8-24. <br />51. The operator has requested, on page 12 of section 4.1.5 of <br />Volume IV, small area exemption status for the coal waste pile <br />topsoil stockpile and the coverfill stockpile. However, no <br />designs have been submitted, pursuant to Rule 4.05.2(3). <br />Please submit such designs, after which the Division can <br />determine whether small area exemption status is appropriate. <br />In the designs, please account for the fact that the two areas <br />seem to be placed at the bottom of drainage watersheds, which <br />could result in significant erosion due to runoff from a storm <br />event. <br />WESTEC has incorporated systems into the design to control <br />runoff above and off of the coverfill and topsoil stockpiles. <br />The topsoil stockpile is protected from uphill overland runoff <br />by the ditch along the haul road to the waste bank. The <br />topsoil stockpile will be seeded contemporaneous with <br />construction, and will have alternative sediment control <br />structures such as silt fences or straw bales at the slope toe <br />to control any sediment that may accumulate. BRL will commit <br />to frequent monitoring of the alternative sediment control <br />structures and upkeep, as necessary. <br />At the coverfill stockpile, the structure is located between <br />two hills, but signs of concentrated flows (i.e., stream <br />erosion) between the hills were not observed in field <br />investigations. Nonetheless, an upland diversion ditch was <br />incorporated topographically above the coverfill stockpile for <br />overland flow protection produced by a 10-year, 24-hour storm <br />event. At the coverfill stockpile haul road, a 10 percent <br />haul road ditch was incorporated for runoff control on the <br />west side of the coverfill stockpile. Alternative sediment <br />control structures such as silt fences or straw bales will be <br />incorporated at the toe of the coverfill stockpile to control <br />runoff from the slope of the stockpile. <br />in addition to the above matters which are intended to meet <br />the effluent limitations of 4.05.2, BRL's request is based on <br />several additional factors. First, the coverfill and topsoil <br />stockpiles encompass very limited areas. Second, WESTEC <br />considered various options in an attempt to locate all <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.