Laserfiche WebLink
F <br />~•I <br />SEDZF7ENT CONTROL <br />1. Bush Draw (2.05.3(3)(c)) <br /> <br />Wyoming Fuel Company (WF) has provided a design for a new culvert to be in- <br />stalled at the Bush Draw crossing. The design technique uses the Manning's <br />equation to determine an acceptable culvert diameter. Manning's equation was <br />developed for steady, uniform, open channel flow. While flow through culverts <br />sometimes approximates open channel flow, the contraction of flow at the inlet <br />makes use of"Manning's equation inappropriate for design of culverts. <br />Charts for determining culvert headwater are available from several sources. <br />Enclosed is a copy of Chart 5 from /lydraulic Charts for the Selection of [iigh- <br />w~ Culverts, U.S. 7~partment of Transportation, December, 1965. This chart <br />is for inlet controlled culverts which is generally the case with short highway <br />culvert installations. Entering this chart using the peak flow estimate <br />generated by W£ of 70 cfs results in a HW/D ratio of approximately 2.5. This <br />indicates that an embankment 1~eight From the base of the culvert inlet to the <br />road surface would need to be about eight feet. <br />The estimated peak flow (70 cfs) appears to be excessive. While the range <br />condition of Bush Draw is very likely "poor", the predominant sage-grass <br />vegetative community presents a fairly dense protective cover and hydrologically <br />probably qualifies as "good". Estimating the percent ground cover at 300, <br />a CN of 74 is generated by Figure .S-3, page 23 of Peak Flows in Colorado, SCS <br />1980. Using a CN of 79 results in a peak flow estimate of approximately 21 cfs. <br />Entering Chart 5 with 21 cfs shows no head ahove the culvert inlet in a 36" <br />culvert and a headwater of approximately 1.7D or 3.4' of headwater in Che <br />existing installation. <br />Wyoming Fuel Company must use some form of closed conduit hydraulics to design <br />culverts. The proferred chart is a simple and acceptable method. [Jyoming <br />Fuel may wish to consider re visiny their peak flow estimate using a more <br />realistic curve number. <br />2. Mine Operations Area <br />The response by [dF is not complete. The purpose and design of the ditch which <br />runs on the West side of the coal stockpile is not given. The Division realizes <br />that water will continue to reach pond xl throughout reclamation efforts in the <br />pit 1 area. However, it is important that a ditch be maintained in order to <br />prevent the collected water from coursing through the reclaimed surface, causing <br />serious erosion problems. <br />2B. Culvert Crossing 1Iau1 Road Near the <br />Using a peak flow of 3.9 cfs and entering the culvert headwater chart, Chart <br />5, a substantial headwater is needed to pass the flow through the culvert. <br />WF may either provide a riprap protected embankment 2' in Height or choose a <br />larger culvert. As the road is a haul road, a foot of fill above the culvert <br />would appear to be reasonable and would provide sufficient depth for the <br />development of a 2' headwater. <br />