APPCOR11855 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Stephen F. Wathen May 14, 1993 Page 4 application, that there are insufficient contamination sources to warrant any ground water monitoring. Also, the reference to Stipulation #4 on page 18 should read Stipulation $`3. 19. Section B - Findings No. III J.1 (p. 19) - A typographic error occurs in the last sentence of the last paragraph; "well" should read "will." 20. Section B - Findings No. III K (p. 20) - In paragraph three under the Probable Effects on Surface Water Quality, the first sentence should be clarified to indicate that most of the runoff from the rail loop is not treated. - In paragraph three under the Probable Effects on Surface Water Quantity, the reference to the area to be "mined" should be changed to the area to be "affected." - The word "and" should be changed to "an" in the second sentence of the last paragraph. 21. Section B - Findings No. III K (o. 22) - The sentence "This low conductivity results in ..." in paragraph one under the subsection Bedrock Ground Water is incorrect. Tab 7, page 4 of the application presents data that clearly demonstrates that the well water is unsuitable for use as stock water. 22. Section B - Findings No. IV (o. 22) - Reference to County Road 53 should be removed from the second-to-the-last paragraph. 23. Section B - Findings No. X (n. 251 - In the third complete paragraph (seventh sentence), "four" grasses (not "few") will contribute more than one percent relative cover. - In the last paragraph (Item 3), woody plant density should be deleted in the sentence listing standards. The parameter is not being used to determine revegetation success. 24. Section B - Findings No. X (n. 26) - Item 4 (top of page). See comment No. 23. - Item 7 needs to rewritten to clarify that no shrub density standard is required. 25. Section B - Findings No. XI (o. 26) - Sentence two in the only paragraph contained in this section has a typographic error. Land uses "are," rather than "is" designated as...