Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Stephen F. Wathen <br />May 14, 1993 <br />Page 3 <br />this subsection, Tab 23 (Bonding) might also be referenced as <br />a source for reclamation information. <br />- In paragraph four of this section, the railroad spur <br />begins 0.3 miles from Hayden and not 0.03 miles. The Division <br />may also want to note the County Road and U.S. Highway 40 in <br />this paragraph. <br />11. Water Consumption (p. 10) - In paragraph one, sentence two, <br />the words "irrigation ditch" should be inserted after "Walker" <br />for clarity. <br />12. Waste Disposal (p. 10) - The word "toxic" is misspelled. <br />13. Reclamation Plan (p. 10) - References to "mining" should be <br />removed or substituted with "operations" in the second <br />paragraph of this section. No mining will occur in the permit <br />area. <br />- The fourth sentence in the first paragraph under <br />Backfilling and Grading needs to be restructured to indicate <br />that debris and coal fines will be buried during the <br />backfilling and grading process, and then covered with <br />topsoil. <br />14. Topsoil Handling and Revegetation (p. 11) - A typographic <br />error exists when using the term "seed mixes" in paragraph <br />two. <br />15. Section A - Findinas No. 12 fp. 15) - Peabody believes that <br />sufficient information was included in the application to <br />determine that alluvial valley floors do not exist within or <br />adjacent to the permit area (see comment No. 27). <br />16. Section A - Findinas No. 7 (p. 14) - The "s" should be removed <br />from the word "operations." <br />17. Section B - Findinas No. III A.1 (p. 16) - There are no new <br />ponds proposed in the application, only the existing two <br />structures. <br />18. Section B - Findinas No. III G.1 (p. 17-18) - Peabody <br />believes, based upon the PHC determinations in the <br />