My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11661
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11661
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:58 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:22:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
7/15/1997
Doc Name
REVIEW OF JULY 1 1997 ADEQUACY REVIEW RESPONSE LORENCITO CANYON MINE PERMIT APPLICATION LORENCITO CO
From
DMG
To
KENT GORHAM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />that a response to this question would be submitted at a later date. As the Division's initial <br />question was not completely answered, the Division responded by stating the response was <br />at that time inadequate (5/27/97). <br />The applicant, in its latest (7/1/97) response. stated that the information requested by the <br />Division's original question would be submitted at a later date, and requested that the <br />Division stipulate the collection and submittal of the information. A proposed methodology <br />for conducting a geotechnical fill evaluation was additionally provided (dated April 30, <br />1997; submitted with the July 1, 1997 response). <br />The Division will stipulate as a condition of approval of the permit that until the information <br />for each of the nine fills requested 6y this original question, and required by Rules <br />2.05.3(6)(6), 2.05.3(6)(c)(I) - (v), 2.05.3(6)(d) and 4.09 is submitted, reviewed and approved <br />by the Division, the Division will withhold its approval for both the nine spoil disposal aeeas <br />and the areas of fill that are proposed to be constructed immediately uphill of each of these <br />nine disposal areas. <br />With regard to the April 30, 1997 Memorandum from CTIJ'I'hompson pertaining to the <br />proposed geotechnical investigation-methodology, the Division has the following comments: <br />(f) the memorandum proposes investigations for Fills 1 through 4 only. As Rule <br />2.05.3(6)(6) requires plans of overburden disposal sites and structures to include a <br />geotechnical investigation for each site and structure, the applicant must ensure that a <br />geotechnical investigation be conducted for each of the nine proposed disposal sites <br />and spoil disposal structures. <br />(g) Once the nine geotechnical investigations aze conducted, the applicant must then <br />supply descriptions, designs and cross-sections for each of the nine proposed disposal <br />sites and spoil disposal structures (not generic plans or designs). These plans must <br />be prepared by not "or under the direction of ') a qualified registered professional <br />engineer, and must describe the geotechnical investigation, design, conswction, <br />operation, maintenance and removal, if appropriate, of each of the nine sites and <br />structures. The results of the nine geotechnical investigations shall include, but not <br />be limited to, that information required by Rule 2.05.3(6)(c). The designs must <br />further comply with the requirements of Rule 4.09. <br />98(6). The applicant has adequately addressed this concern. <br />98(c). The applicant has adequately addressed this concern. ~P/1(~ <br />98(d). The applicant has adequately addressed this concern. <br />98(f). The applicant has adequately addressed this concern. <br />~ar,~ IS s~i~~ rP~"`'~,rl <br />((1 V 6t"~f~ ~^^~ <br />99. The applicant has adequately addressed this concern. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.