My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11636
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11636
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:57 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:22:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
4/27/1981
Doc Name
PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW FN C-041-81
From
MLR
To
GEX COLORADO INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page Thirteen <br />Preliminary Adequacy Review <br />GEX - Roadside 5 Cameo Mines <br />April 27, 1981 <br />4.03.2(4)(3) Culverts and Bridges <br />Culvert Designs: The use of Mannings equation of Conveyance Factor methodology <br />is inappropriate for drainage culverts. These methods do not account for <br />the headloss inherent in the design. GEX must use closed conduit hydraulics <br />to design the culvert system. <br />4.05.6 Sedimentation Ponds <br />LISLE: GEX has used C values from SCS publication Technical Note 50, <br />figure 7. This figure is inappropriate for disturbed watersheds. Values <br />for disturbed watersheds are more likely to approximate values given in <br />Table 5. 4, page 202, Hydrology and Sedimentology of Surface Mined Lands by <br />Barfield and Haan (1978). In areas where C values change, e.g., refuse piles <br />and undisturbed rangeland, C values may be area weighted. GEX must use C <br />values in LISLE calculations which are either obviously conservative or derive <br />them from applicable tables or figures. <br />Spillway Designs: The use of Mannings equation for sediment pond spillway <br />design is inappropriate. As the spillways for several of the ponds are drop <br />inlet CMP a stage discharge relationship for changing controls (wier, <br />orifice, pipe) must be used (4.05.6(3)(d)). <br />_ Y <br />Dewatering Devices: Several of the ponds have no means of dewatering. As <br />per Rule 9.05.6(3)(c) all ponds must have a dewatering device. <br />Detention Time: GEX must address the question of detention time in each <br />of their ponds in order to evaluate the likelihood of the effluent limitations <br />(4.05.2(7)) being met. <br />Sediment Cleanout: GEX has stated that they intend to remove accumulated <br />sediment every three (3) years. As this represents the entire sediment <br />storage volume for the ponds this maintenance schedule is unacceptable. GEX <br />must propose a more acceptable maintenance schedule. The Division would <br />prefer a maintenance schedule which calls for sediment removal when 60~ <br />of the sediment storage volume is filled or before. A permanent marker placed <br />at the approved cleanout level in the ponds would assist the operator and <br />insper_tion personnel in providing proper maintenance. <br />Short Circuiting: Pond 3 at ti.e Railroad Spur has an inlet very close to <br />the outlet spillway. GEX must either redesign the pond or provide sufficient <br />baffling to prevent short circuiting 4.05.6(6). <br />4.10 Coal Processing Waste Banks <br />1. The application must contain the results of geotechnical analysis, <br />discussion of embankment stability, cross-sections and all other information <br />required by 9.10 for both the Cameo and Roadside coal processing waste <br />embankments. A11 pertinent information submitted for approval in 1980 should <br />be adequate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.