My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11629
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11629
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:57 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:22:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981020
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/4/1982
Doc Name
REVIEW OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE MUNGER CANYON COAL MINES SUPPLEMENTAL PERMIT SUBMITTALS
From
MLRD
To
JIM PENDELTON
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />XX. Roads (2.05.3(31, 4. <br />The proposed haul road for the Munger Canyon mine is approximately 2 miles in <br />length. This road follows the alignment of an existing pioneer road excavated <br />in 2977. This road, as the applicant observes, can be divided into two <br />distinct design segments. The lower segment connects State Highway No. 139 <br />(Sta. 0+00') and the confluence of the Munger Creek Canyon with the canyon <br />of the unnamed tributary to Munger Creek on which the portals are located <br />(Sta. 67+00'). This segment occupies the relatively broad canyon floor at a <br />fairly low gradient (2.6~). The majority of this segment consists of a low <br />constructed road berm. <br />The upper segment of the haul road connects the confluence of the two stream <br />valleys (Sta. 67+00') with the mine portal bench (Sta. 104+30'). This roughly <br />3700 foot long segment climbs at a steeper gradient (7.5,) along the southern <br />valley wall of the valley of the unnamed tributary to Munger Creek. The <br />southern wall of this canyon is steep, with cross-slopes in excess of 300, <br />obviously qualifying as a "steep slope mining area". In order to straighten <br />the alignment of the existing pioneer road in order to accommodate larger <br />coal hauling vehicles, the applicant proposes to enlarge existing road cuts <br />and construct berms across several drainage swales. <br />In response to comments made by the Division in its Preliminary Adequacy Review, <br />Sheridan Enterprises has submitted a geotechnical analysis and design recommendations <br />for the proposed haul road. This report, prepared by Geo-Hydro Consultants, Inc., <br />contains geotechnical conclusions regarding the stability of the proposed haul <br />road corridor and recommendations for the construction of necessary road cuts and <br />road fill embankments. The consultant's methodology consists basically of <br />geological mapping of the affected area and observation of the performance of <br />cuts adjoining the existing pioneer road, which was constructed roughly 4 years <br />prior to this investigation. <br />The geotechnical investigation determined that four basic soil or rock types <br />are encountered along the road's alignment. While no major or deep-seated land- <br />slides have occurred along the pioneer road, some shallow sloughing has occurred. <br />ay observing the cut slope gradients in areas of sloughing and correlating these <br />observations with the four characteristic material types encountered, the <br />applicant's consultant has developed recommendations regarding the maximum stable <br />cut slope gradients for each characteristic material type. (See Table 2.2-2) <br />The consultant's methodology is sound in this analysis. <br />Geo-Hydro's report contains the statement; "If our recommendations are accepted, <br />the cuts will probably be stable for the lifetime of the mine; sloughing will <br />have to be expected and maintenance of the road will be required." The applicant's <br />consultant has determined those cut slope gradients which should be stable during <br />the operational life of the mine. In other words, the consultant has deduced what <br />cut slope gradients for each characteristic soil or bedrock type encountered will <br />assure a cut slope with a static slope safety factor which exceeds 2.0. The <br />applicant's consultant has not completed a mathematical stability analysis of the <br />cut slopes or fill embankments proposed to accommodate the enlarged haul road. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.