APPCOR11597

• Permit No: C1983058
• IBM Index Class Name: Application Correspondence
• Doc Date: 1/12/1983
• Doc Name: TWIN PINES NO 2 MINE COMPLETENESS REVIEW
• From: MLRD
• To: ED BISCHOFF
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES III III III IIIIIII III
D Mome Pascoe, E.ecuhve Duector
MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION
DAVID C. SHEL70N Director
R~chartl D. Lamm
Governor
January 12, 1983
T0: Ed Bischoff
FROM: Jerry Zimpfer
RE: Twin Pines No. 2 Mine Completeness Review
Alluvial Valley Floor-
The information submitted is insufficient to make an AVF determination.
To be complete the applicant should submit the following:
1) A map of unconsolidated stream laid deposits in or adjacent to the
permit area - Siiow for Uak Creek down to and iricludin9 irrigated hayfield
Lewis Gulch, South Oak Creek, and unnamed tributary to
South Uak Creek.
Show on map- proposed permit boundary.
Areas disturbed by past surface mining.
2) Show on Map -areas of historic or existing flood irrigation
areas where vegetation suggests subirrigation.
3) If areas of unconsolidated stream laid deposits are identified in
drainages where there is no existing or historic flood irrigation, it is
necessary to assess their capability for flood irrigation. The applicant
should describe regional flood irrigation practices for watersheds of a
similar size or smaller.
Additional information may be required for adequacy, depends upon AVF
determination.
SURFACE WATER -
DISCUSSION OF PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES - Brief discussion p.
94-96. Not supported by baseline data or analysis. The applicant should
either provide a quantitative assessment of the following possible
hydrologic effects or provide sufficient discussion to show that the
effects would not be significant.

423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Streel Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. [phone]