Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~~ I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <br />STATE OFCOLORADO RiC HARDD LAM M. GO~e moi 999 <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />D. Monte Pascoe, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />December 29, 1981 <br />TO: Dan Mathews <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton ~. <br />RE: Review of "S1 e St Zity Analysis, West Portal Area - <br />Bear Mine" ( e 2 of 2 - Bear Coal Company Permit Application) <br />Pursuant to your request, 1 have reviewed the supplemental submittal by Bear <br />Coal Company, entitled "Slope Stability Analysis, West Portal Area - Bear <br />Mine". Z forward the following comments for your consideration. <br />The western portal set of the Bear mine exists within an ancient landslide <br />complex. Slope morphology of this type is more the rule than the exception <br />for the valley of the North Fork of the Gunnison. <br />The stability analysis performed by Rocky Mountain Geotechnical is a <br />sensitivity-type analysis which considered a range of material strengths <br />and alternative backfiZl and grading configurations. Material strength prop- <br />erties were determined for both highwall materials and existing bench fill <br />materials. The analysis also assumed that a limited perched water table <br />might develop within the toe of the existing fill bench, but that no true <br />phreatic condition would develop, because of steep slope grades and relatively <br />impermeable backfill materials. This is probably a valid assumption if <br />drainage is precluded from the portals into the backfilled bench. I recommend <br />that you request Roy .Cox review the hydrology aspects of their abandonment <br />plan to determine whether or not drainage will, indeed, occur. <br />Briefly summarized, the stability analysis projects that a backfilled static <br />slope safety factor of 1.3 or greater can be achieved in two manners: <br />(11 The existing portal highwall could be partially backfilled (approximately <br />half its existing height would be covered); or <br />(2) The existing portal highwall could be totally backfilled if a supporting <br />buttress toe berm was constructed throughout the length of the existing bench, <br />approximately 20 feet high by 30 feet wide. <br />The partially backfilled configuration achieves a static slope safety factor of <br />Z.3 only if we assume an internal angle of friction of 41° or higher for the <br />highwall materials. This value is higher than the laboratory test determined <br />value of 33.7° for effective peak stress and should, therefore, involve monitor- <br />ing of the final backfilled configuration to assure stability. <br />