My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11586
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11586
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:55 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:21:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
4/20/1981
Doc Name
PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW DORCHESTER 1 MINE FN C-014-81
From
MLR
To
DORCHESTER COAL CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Sediment storage = 0.1 ac ft/ac (11.35 ac) = 1.135 ac-ft. Total <br />pond volume = 1.55 ac-ft plus 1.135 ac-ft = 2.685 ac-ft. The <br />Division will approve a sediment storage volume less than 0.1 <br />ac-ft/ac only if soil erosion calculations are submitted to <br />verify value used (for example, use U.S.L.E. or M.U.S.C.L.E.). <br />Peak flow calculations do not include a slope adjustment or <br />basin shape adjustment factor as outlined in Appendix E of <br />"Peak flows in Colorado." However, since the spillway was <br />designed far the 100 yr event, there is more than enough <br />conservatism in the design. The Division will therefore not <br />require any adjustment. <br />Spillway sizing: To verify that the spillway has adequate <br />capacity, the Division requires the calculation of head Zoss <br />through the spillway. the headloss should include entrance Loss, <br />bend Loss, friction Loss, and tailwater, if applicable. The <br />alternative to this procedure is to size the spillway using <br />"Federal Highway Administration Homographs" or nomograph pro- <br />cedures from other references such as the Armco pipe design <br />handbook. <br />Information on dewatering method and detention times must <br />also be sumbitted for this pond. <br />B. Pond 9 Calculations: Pond volume calculations must <br />be revised. T/~e sediment storage capacity must be 0.1 ac-ft <br />(44.77 ac-f t) = 4,97 ac-ft unless a lower value is justified <br />using soil loss calculations. Information on detention time <br />and method of dewatering must be included. <br />Spillway designs: Because the spillway was designed for a <br />100 yr. •svent the sltlpe adjustment and basin shape correction <br />factor will not be required. However, the culvert spillway <br />design must include information on head loss as previously <br />mentioned in Pon 1 comments. <br />C. Diversion Ditch Calculations: We were unable to determine <br />whether the diversion ditch on Figure 8 is a permanent or <br />temporary diversion. If the ditch is permanent, the peak <br />discharge calculations must include a basin shape and slope <br />adjustment correction factor. The ditch must also incorporate <br />0.3 ft of design freeboard. And additional capacity for <br />vegetated conditions must be included in the ditch design. <br />Diversion ditch culvert design must include information on <br />head loss due to entrance loss, friction loss, and tail water. <br />Maximum allowable head is a main consideration. The ditch is <br />only 1.0 feet deep yet a 2.5 foot culvert is used. It is <br />obvious that the ditch will overflow before the culvert flows <br />full. This situation must be remedied. (Several small culverts <br />might be appropriate.) <br />(6) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.