My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11470
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11470
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:52 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:20:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
4/28/1981
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
MLRD
To
ROCKCASTLE CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />~r <br />STATE OI~ COt 9r2A r)O Hil'Il AHI1 n, i fnynin ur <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL gESOURCES ~ I I III IIIIII IIII III <br />D. Monte Pascoe, Executive Director 999 <br />MINED LAND RE(;LAMA'I'ION <br />423 Centennial Building. 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 839-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />April 28, 1981 <br />The Rockcastle Company <br />Mr. William F. Heiden <br />P.O. BOX AA <br />Hayden, Colorado 81639 <br />Re: Grassy Creek No. 1 Permit Application <br />Our File Mo. C-039-81 <br />Dear Mr. Reiden: <br />This preliminary adequacy letter conveys concerns which have been identified <br />in the preliminary adequacy review of the above referenced application by our <br />staff. This letter constitutes the 60-day notification of preliminary <br />findings as required in 2.07.9(1) of the Colorado Rules and Regulations. The <br />preliminary nature of the enclosed comments must be stressed at this point. <br />Additional information may be required from The Rockcastle Company as the <br />review continues. <br />The Division's decision to approve, deny, or modify the permit application or <br />to continue the review for another 60 days after the one hundred twenty day <br />review period expires, depends largely upon how rapidly The Rockcastle Company <br />is able to respond to this letter. It is unlikely that the Division will be <br />able to have sufficient time to complete the review b e hundred twentieth <br />(120) day if your responses are received after June 12 1981 Please submit <br />any requested information in a Form whichcanle readily included in the present <br />application. I recommend that once you have examined our comments we have a <br />meeting to discuss the issues. <br />If you have any questions or concerns, please contact either Fred Banta or myself. <br />Sincerely, <br />.--,. <br />._.,~..~ <br />l ~ UM.d-r^--- <br />Brian Munson <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />BM:mab <br />Attachment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.