My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11399
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11399
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:42 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:20:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981048
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
5/6/1981
Doc Name
ADDITIONAL PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY COMMENTS ON FILE FN C-048-81
From
MLR
To
TRINIDAD BASIN MINING INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i ` • • <br />parameters is included with this letter. This information is needed to <br />identify strata that may be acid forming, alkalinity forming, toxic <br />forming, salinity forming, combusible or unstable. The data from the <br />analyses will be used to assess vegetation success, impacts of mining <br />on water quality, and to support statements concerning hydrologic <br />consequences and impacts of mining. The applicant should include the <br />name of the laborartory and the method of analysis. <br />6. The applicant must provide a structural contour map for the Cass <br />Seam. <br />7. TBM must provide isopach maps of both coal seams to be mined. <br />Hydrology 2.04.7 <br />1. The applicant should submit the raw data used in the pump tests. <br />Information should also include dates, locations, and methods of all pump <br />tests and observation well results. <br />2. The applicant could not provide information on the source of water <br />for the wells listed on Table IV-7. The applicant should obtain and <br />submit the State Engineers well records for these wells that would enable <br />the Division to determine which aquifers the wells were completed in. <br />3. The Division requires a years baseline data on surface water quality <br />and quantity in sufficient detail to assess seasonal variations in flow <br />and quality. The applicant may also comply with section 2.04.7 (surface <br />water) by providing accurate descriptive and predictive information on <br />surface water quality and quantity based on extrapolation by an expert <br />in the field from documented data on water quality and quantity of <br />similar areas, provided that the data used by the expert is included in <br />the application and is approved by the Division. <br />TBM has attempted to characterize flow in the Del Agua drainage 6y <br />extrapolating data on stream flow from the Apishapa River. The method <br />used to extrapolate the data is not acceptable to the Division and was <br />never approved by the Division. The following problems were identified <br />with the methods that were not addressed or taken into consideration <br />by TBM. <br />I. Data Base Problems <br />A. Time of Record (Stream flow records of 1940-1950 do not take <br />into consideration the increase in development during the past <br />30 years. Urbanization, agricultural development, etc., can change <br />runoff characteristics greatly.) <br />B. Water Consumption (Increased water use over the past 30 years <br />can have a significant impact on stream flow.) <br />C. Frequency Analysis (Having I1 years of data and using the highest <br />point does not necessarily define a 10 year event. This is a <br />statistical event which in reality may not occur during a given <br />(21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.