My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11279
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11279
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:38 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:19:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
11/8/1981
Doc Name
JOINT MEETING BETWEEN THE OSM AND MLRD TO DISCUSS REVISION OF BEAR COAL CO PERMIT
From
BEAR COAL CO INC
To
OSM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1•iessrs. Banta and Daws <br />October 29, 1981 <br />Page 2 <br />• Revision to the existing permit to encompass the adjacent area <br />• Approval Timetables. <br />Background Information Concerning Present Necessity for Mining in Adjacent <br />Rasarvac <br />41e did not anticipate a short time frame for the current immediate need to <br />receive a revision for facility relocation and subsequent mining in an <br />adjacent area. <br />In 1970, the Bear Coal Company sold surface lands and transferred mineral <br />rights to Atlantic Richfield Company ("ARCO") under the assumption that <br />mining from the bear No. 1 and No. 2 Portals would continue through at <br />least 1982 and perhaps to an unspecified future date. Underground <br />operations in the Bear IJo. 2 Mine has proceded with plans for pillar <br />extraction to occur once the development was completed. However, in the <br />late spring of 1981, ARCO informed us that the pillars could not be <br />recovered, even though the Bear Coal Company had developed tFiem. As you <br />know, the extraction of pillars from an underground mine is the most <br />economical and best method of making production from room and pillar <br />ur~derground operations. <br />4lith the ARCO notice of limited pillar recovery, almost two million tons of <br />coal will be left intact; this coal v+ill probably be lost for future <br />recovery even though Bear Coal Company put forth the time, expense and <br />effort to prepare these pillars for extraction on retreat from the mine. <br />And, unfortunately, with the untimely notice of ARCO, we are now forced to <br />limit future mining activities, thus causing the most immediate need for <br />approval to mine in the adjacent area. <br />In early 1981, we requested from ARCO the right of access into an adjacent <br />property where surface facilities will be relocated for the Bear No. 2 <br />Portals. l•!e have a surface and mineral lease from Anchor Coal Company for <br />surface facility relocation and actual mining. It v+as assumed that there <br />v+ould be no difficulty in obtaining the access rights from ARCO; however, <br />our assumption was not correct, and we were denied access. <br />Left Faith no recourse, the Bear Coal Company filed a lawsuit in Gunnison <br />County District Court on October 15, 1981 against ARCO to gain compensation <br />for the coal lost on retreat mining and to gain legal right-of-way access <br />into the facilities and portal locations of the adjacent area. <br />Our lawsuit against ARCO does not change the permit revision situation with <br />either OSM or the Division. However, we are diligently working to prepare <br />an application satisfactory to both agencies which might allow us to mine <br />coal at the earliest possible date. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.