Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~e~inient pupas at pits 1, ~, ;;, and 4 ooviously are not constructedi it <br />epnemeral water courses, a_no fol]uwing final reclamation ana oackfillinc <br />' of collection ditches it is questionable whetner surface runoff would <br />maintain an adequate supply of water in the pond. 7ne proposed sediment <br />pond at pit 8 is within 4UU feet of an existing stock pond. <br />1. Tne applicant snoulo provide a discussion demonstrating that tn. <br />use of water from these impoundments would be in compliance witr~ <br />' State La,;. <br />Z For eacn pond to De left as a permanent impoundment, the applicant <br />must provide a detailed design plan prepared oy, or under the <br />' direction of, znd certified oy a qualified registered professional <br />engineer. The Alan must si+ow• that the pond would meet th° <br />appropriate design Standards of Rule 4.u~.9(1) e ana tnat any <br />permanent diversions associated with the pond would meet the <br />standards of Rule 4.05_3. The plan should specifically identify <br />any renovation required to convert the sediment pond or ditches to <br />the standards for permanent impoundments and ditches. <br />3. For each permanent impoundment, the applicant should provide <br />sufficient hydrologic analysis to sho+v that water levels would be <br />' sufficiently stable to support their intended use. It is <br />uncertain if stock ponds located high on the hillsides would <br />receive sufficient runoff to accumulate water. <br />' 4. The water quality for ponds receiving only surface runoff should <br />be sufficient for stock water use. However, ponds receiving water <br />' that has passed through the spoil nay not have a suitable water <br />quality. For any permanent impoundment that would receive spoil <br />water (either becuase the pond is in contact with the bottom of <br />the pit and would receive unsaturated flow or because tfie spoil <br />would develop an aquifer and the pond would intersect the <br />post-mining spoil water levels), the applicant should provide, <br />water.~uality predictions demonstrating the suitability of the <br />water for stock water use. <br />' ~ Sediment Ponds <br />1. Sediment ponds at Pits 1, 2, 3, and 4 are located on hill slopes, <br />and as a result, discharge could potentially result in significant <br />erosion if not properly controlled. Rule 4.05.7 requires that <br />i discharge be controlled by energy dissipators where necessary to <br />reduce erosion and minimize disturbance to the Hydrologic <br />balance. To date, ponds at pits 1, 2, and 3 have not discharged. <br />Pond sizing calculations have not been submitted for these ponds <br />and it may be tnat the ponds are of sufficient volume to contain <br />the entire runoff from the 25 year, 2k Hour event. r+s previously <br />approved existing structures they may oe acceptaole. However, <br />' design dra~vings and certification that the ponds have peen <br />constructed as designed (Rule 4.05.6(7)) must be included in the <br />permanent program permit application. <br />