My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11234
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11234
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:37 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:18:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/4/1984
Doc Name
RESPONSES TO PERMIT REVIEW LETTER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />' 4. Revegetation success criteria for species diversity and woody plant density <br />are not addressed in the application. Since livestock grazing is the proposed <br />primary post-mining land use, and given the landowner request, shrub reestab- <br />lishment may not be required. This determination will depend on resolution <br />of the issues noted in Section XII! Wildlife of this Letter. A proposal for <br />evealuatinq species diversity and a species diversity standard, as required <br />by Rule 9.15.8(5) must be included in the application. <br />' A species diversity success criterion is proposed based on the Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division's Proposed Policy for Evaluating <br />~ Species Diversity, as follows: <br />Diversity will be based on cover data. Revegetation will be considered <br />successful if the data demonstrate the presence of at least-f~ve-peren- <br />nial9species with relative importance of at least 3 percent, with all <br />of these species combined not exceeding 75 percent relative importance, <br />g nor any one of these species exceeding 40 percent relative importance. <br />' Criteria for woody plant density and diversity are not proposed at <br />this time. <br />1 S. The primary seed mix, which includes a number of introduced forage <br />grasses, including crested wheatgrass, may be appropriate given the land use <br />' considerations and landowner request. A concern expressed in the past with <br />regard to crested wheatgrass is that, when used in a mix with native species <br />it will tend to dominate the stand to the exclusion of other seeded species. <br />This concern is based primarily on research in the northern great plains, <br />but has not been documented in northwestern Colorado. The applicant should <br />commit to a revegetation monitoring program which will document the com- <br />petitive relationship among the various species. <br />1 W e agree that not enough is known about the behavior of crested <br />wheatgrass when seeded in mixtures with natives. It is fairly well <br />' established that since the palatability of crested wheatgrass is lower <br />than for many other grass species, grazing tends to favor crested <br />wheatgrass establishment at the expense of more palatable species <br />' which are grazed more heavily. Proper grazing management can <br />reduce this trend. <br />Virtually all published research on seeding crested wheatgrass in mixtures <br />deals with mixtures in which crested wheatgrass is a major constituent <br />of the mix. The mixture proposed in the permit application includes <br />crested wheatgrass as a relatively minor constituent. It is included <br />' for the following reasons: <br />. It will help stabilize the soil surface and reduce erosion. <br />' It is well adapted to the soils and climate of the area. <br />. It is a reliable germinator. <br />. Its presence will add to the diversity of the reclaimed <br />' stand. <br />. It is nutritious as summer forage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.