Laserfiche WebLink
I:~. TO,-'~.,!_ - ~~U~tS L.U,.9, 2.u5..i(5), 2.US.•7(2)(d) ana a.U6 <br />The a;nended permit application has changed significantly in regard to the <br />topsoil plan. originally, Empire Energy Corporation was proposing to <br />import to;isoil to cover all disturbed areas where topsoil was cot <br />salvaged. In the amended application, Empire Energy Corporation iias <br />proposed to use the existing materi-rl as a plant yrowth rnediu~n and replace <br />Cuhsoil in those areas where it was salvaged. Overall, tFiis is an <br />acceptable pian, but there are many proole~ns with the plan as it is <br />presented. <br />CK1 f lC;\L t,UFJUI_ItIJS - <br />Nll concerii~ in this section are cr~Lical and must be r'esolve:d prior Lu <br />permit issuance. <br />of critical concern is the informwtion needed for uonGiny. pue to tr,e <br />complexity or` this plan, including areas of prior disturbance, c w•rent <br />construction plans and plar~ned future disturbances, it is difficult to <br />determine, available volumes of topsoil and overburden which will be usgd <br />during recla~uation. A table iiwst be prepared showing the surface area of <br />each location to be disturbed and reclaimed, the volume and type or <br />material which will oe used to reclaim each of these locations, the final <br />depth of the replaced material, and the current status of t'ne ;proposed <br />seedbed material (topsoil, subsoil, overburden, in-place, stored, to ue <br />i~,ipurtec. ur moved from another on-site location; etc.). An approprizte <br />u,a,i must 3150 lie included showing all existing or planned disturbed areas, <br />current topsoil or other seedbed material storage areas and all areas to <br />be reclaimed. ldithout this information, it is not possible to deter.nine <br />the feasibility of reclaiming the permit area or determining a bond amount. <br />STIPULATfUiaS - <br />These concerns could be stipulated as conditions to the permit. <br />Empire Energy Corporation states that Rule 4.p6.2(4)(a), which is the <br />requirements for using selected overburden ~uaterials, does not apply to <br />previously disturbed areas. This state~ner~t is incorrect. The fact that <br />topsoil was not salvayed from previously disturbed areas does riot relieve <br />the applicant from demonstrating that the existing overlw rden is the best <br />available growth medium. 'n order For Che Uivisio~~ to issue a pc:rait, a <br />rindiny must be made that reclamation success is feasible at tr,a site. <br />Since one of the main determining factors for evaluating reclamation <br />success is a suitable plant yrowth ~nediiam and the Division must have <br />detailed information demonstrating Che suitability of an on-site ;ro;ah <br />medium. <br />