APPCOR11208

• Permit No: C1996084
• IBM Index Class Name: Application Correspondence
• Doc Name: LORENCITO CANYON MINE PR EXHIBIT 2
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

s on e
• The surface elevation of BH-I should read 7298 instead of 7238. This was a typographical
error that is corrected on the Geologic Map. The elevation depicted on the lithologic logs
was prior to the borehole being surveyed. Additionally, the location of BH-1 was incorrect
and has also been corrected on the Geologic Map. The correct elevation is shown on the logs
in Exhibit 6, pages G-1-72 through G-1-80.
43. The Geology Map depicts the elevation of BH-2 as 7167 feet but the lithologic log indicates
7300 feet. Which is correct?
on e
The surface elevation of BH-2 is correct on the Geologic Map. The elevation depicted on
the lithologic logs was prior to the wells being surveyed. The correct elevation is shown on
the logs in Exhibit 6, page G-1-81 to G-1-89.
44. The Geology Map shows cross-section B-B' starting from the west with BH-1, LT-029, LT-
30 and DH-069. Cross-section B-B' is ordered from the west starting with LT-028, LT-029,
BH-001, LT-30, DH-069. Please correct and/or clarify this information.
Response
• The cross section B-B' Map G-2 been corrected to show the correct cross section from
LT-028, BH-1, LT-029, LT-3 , DH- , LT31 and DH-60. The Geologic Map has also been
corrected to show this cross se 'on sequence. ~~,p~ 9
45. Why does the Geology Map indicate the R seam at 7248 feet for hole DH-60 when the
surface casing elevation is 7225 feet?
Res~nse
The surface casing elevation of DH- 60 is 7325. The listed elevation of 7225 was a
typographical error. The Geology map has been corrected to reflect the accurate surface
casing elevation.
46. The sill depicted on the Geology Map is badly skewed and does not appeaz to generally
follow the topography. Please correct.
Response
The sills on the Geology map have been coaected to follow the local topography.
• 47. DH-80 is not depicted on the geology map as lying on cross-section C-C'.
13