My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10691
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10691
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:27:03 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:12:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
7/25/1989
Doc Name
BASELINE SOIL SURVEY FOR THE YOAST AREA
From
MLRD
To
PEABODY COAL CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />i ~~~ <br />~~ <br />5 T ATE ~F COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Govei <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Director <br />July 25, 198y <br />Mr. Gary 4Jendt <br />Peaoody Coal Company <br />1.300 South Yale <br />Flagstaff, AZ 6JiUUl <br />RE: Baseline Soil Survey for the Yoast Area <br />Dear Mr. Wendt: <br />Tne Division has reviewed .your letter of July 5, 1969 concerning the proposes <br />soil survey on the Yoast area. Generally, the soil baseline program appears <br />acceptaole. However, we have four specific comments on the proposed sampllnq <br />intensity, sampling parameters and suitability criteria. <br />First, after consultation with experienced soil survey specialists of the USDA <br />- Soil Conservation Service, the Division believes that soil sampling <br />intensities should be increased. We suggest the following sampling intensity <br />guideline: <br />Size of Area (acres) No. of Samples <br />X25 1 <br />'L5-100 2 <br />101-250 3 <br />251-40U 4 <br />401- ii00 5 <br />>000 6 <br />This guideline is oased on a knowledge of the approximate sizes of most soil <br />taxonomic units in the area. We feel that this number of samples will assure <br />adequate soil characterization even if soil pedons at sample sites are not <br />completely representative. Soii sampling sites should also be Chosen in such <br />a manner that different aspects and slope positions of the same soil type are <br />represented. <br />Second, the Division believes that it is difficult to determine whether soils <br />are "Known unsuitaole soil types" if no samples are taken. It is our position <br />that soils which are suspected of being unsuitable should, at the very least, <br />be sampled and tested for texture, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and <br />sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). This would provide a more oojecttve measure of <br />topsoil suitaoility. If the soil is unsuitaole after these tests, then <br />further tests would be unnecessary. <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.