My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10641
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10641
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:27:00 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:12:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Name
Initial adequacy review
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. Rule 2.06.7 Variances for Delay in Contemporaneous Reclamation Requirements in <br />Combined Surface and UG Operations <br />~~ 18. The applicant states on page 2.06-2 that no delay in contemporaneous reclamation as a <br />result of underground operations will occur. As such, the application is in compliance <br />with this section. <br />Rule 2.06.8 Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations on Areas, or adjacent to <br />Areas, Includin~Alluviel Valley Floors <br />119. Applicants may affirmatively demonstrate in their application the presence of alluvial <br />valley floors (Section 2.06.8(3)(6)). If, however, applicants believe that certain stream- <br />holding valleys within and adjacent to the permit do not contain alluvial valley floors, the <br />applicant must provide the results of a field investigation to the Division, and the Division <br />(not the applicant) must then determine whether those stream-holding valleys contain <br />alluvial valley floors (2.06.8(3)(6)). (DIH) <br />Because of this regulatory procedure, the Division requests the following: <br />a) On page 2.06-2, change "In summary, Lorencito Canyon does not qualify as an <br />• AVF" to "In summary, Lorencito Canyon does not appeaz to contain any <br />AVFs";(DIH) <br />b) On page 2.06-2, change "Cow Canyon does not qualify as an AVF" to "Cow <br />Canyon does not appeaz to contain an AVF"; (DIH) <br />' ,0~5 <br />c) On page 2.06-3, change "Alamosa Canyon does not qualify as an AVF" to <br />O~ "Alamosa Canyon does not appeaz to contain an AVF"; (DIH) <br />d) On page 2.06-3, change "Chimney, Puertecito, and Jeff Canyons do not have <br />alluvial valley floors as defined by Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act <br />(SMCRA)" to "Chimney, Puertecito, and Jeff Canyons do not appear to contain <br />an AVF". (DIH) <br />e) Similaz sentences appeaz in the conclusions section of Exhibit 18, "AVF Technical <br />Report." They should be similazly revised as well. (DIH) <br />120. For the Division to make its determinations pursuant to Section 2.06.8, please provide the <br />following: <br />O~ I t a) The size (in square feet or acres) and crop yield of the irrigated pazcel of land <br />situated on the South Fork of the Purgatoire River shown on Maps 2.04.7-2 and <br />~`r~/~J 2.05.5-1; (DIH) <br />b) Please confirm whether a pazcel of land the size of the irrigated parcel on the <br />~`~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.