My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10584
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10584
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:57 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:11:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981048
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/7/1982
Doc Name
PR FOR TRINIDAD BASIN MINE FN C-048-81
From
MLR
To
TRINIDAD BASIN MINING INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~= <br />--3- <br />c) Models or ongoing monitorincr would he used to support the above <br />statements, <br />d) The applicant would then describe what sediment control measures would <br />be used on mined areas as well as roads to minimize the impact. A <br />prediction of how successful this mitigation measure would be is also <br />appropriate. <br />e) Finally, it would be mentioned that this impact will be foY the "life- <br />of-mine" and will decrease as reclamation increases for a given area, <br />The following is a brief List of some o.f the more common impacts considered in <br />applications. TBbf should consider this list at a minimum in their application. <br />a) Impacts to local and regional aquifers by dewatering, recharging, <br />affecting quality, or destruction. Aquifers identified and considered <br />need not be developed, The threshold yield usually considered is about 0.5 <br />gallons/minute. <br />b) Impacts to seeps and springs should be included. These water sources <br />may affect base flow in sterams or could even be developed for stockwater <br />needs. <br />c) Short-term and Long-term impacts to recharge rates by increasing or <br />decreasing recharge area, permeability or water source. <br />d) Effects on surface water from leachate of refuse piles. <br />e) Effects of placing ponds over backfilled spoil areas. Percolation of <br />water from the bottom of the pond through the spoils may change its quality. <br />How does this amount of water compare with hhe overall water budget? <br />f) Increases in sediment or changes in salt loading from roads, diversions, <br />or mine water pumped to streams, <br />g) Surface water will impound within the sediment storage volume of ponds <br />and evaporate. This water will not be available for downstream use. Xow <br />significant is this Loss of water - quantify, Will mining tend to increase <br />or decrease runoff rates from reclaimed areas? Now does this affect the <br />hydrologic balance? <br />h) Will diversion of water within the watershed affect the natural <br />equilibrium of the Canyon channel o.r any of its tributaries? Will roads or <br />diversions affect erosion at discharge points? <br />i) What are the ionic characteristics of springs, seeps, ground water <br />and surface water flow? Xow do they compare? Will water exposure to <br />bedrock, refuse, or backfilled spoi.i change the ionic balance of the water? <br />What is the magnitude and significance of the change? <br />j) Are any mining operation structures within the floodplain (100 yr.)of <br />the Canyon that would cause damage to the hydrologic environment? <br />(Refuse pile, coal stockpiles, clams, etc. are of primary concern.) <br />k) Are any wells nearby that could be affected by changes in water quality <br />or quantity? <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.