My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10546
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10546
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:56 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:11:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984062
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/11/1983
Doc Name
TR TO PN 76-16 FOR COMPLIANCE WITH WQCD RN 11/30/82
From
MLRD
To
JERRY ZIMPFER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N <br />-~- <br />maintain sufficient open sediment storage in the pond. Available <br />sediment storage in the pond should be sufficient to contain either one <br />year's sediment yield or the sediment yield from the 10-year, 24-hour <br />rainfall event. <br />5) The applicant failed to adjust the peak flow estimate of the <br />L5-year, 24-hour rainfall event for varying basin shape. Peak flow <br />should be reestimated making both the slope and basin shape adjustments. <br />(Refer to Appendix E in Peak Flows in Colorado.) <br />6) She emergency spillway for Pond E was sized using the Manning <br />Equation for open channel flow. This methodology is incorrect. The <br />applicant should demonstrate that the proposed design is adequate using <br />the Broad - Crested Weir Equation. <br />Collection and Diversion Ditches <br />1) Peak flow calculations for the ditches were not adjusted for <br />varying slope or basin shape. Peak flows should be reestimated making <br />both the slope and basin shape adjustments. <br />2) The calculated ditch velocities are for grass-lined channels. The <br />ditches will be in place and functioning for some tune before adequate <br />vegetation protection can be achieved. Therefore, the applicant should <br />show that unprotected channel velocities (earthen channel) would not be <br />erosive. <br />Alluvial Vallev Floors <br />Formal AVF determinations and findings have not yet been mane for Mine <br />No. 3. Adjacent portions of both Fish Creek and Dliddle Creek are <br />potential alluvial valley floors. The activities being approved in this <br />technical revision (construction of 1 sediment pond and six diversion <br />ditches) would not effect these potential alluvial valley floors. Most <br />of the disturbance is within the Fish Creek drainage, and, as indicated <br />on Map TR-3, it would be located outside of the area identified as <br />unconsolidated stream laid deposits. Therefore, the proposed operations <br />would not interrupt, discontinue, or preclude farming on the potential <br />AVF. <br />The sediment control plan would control runoff from the existing surface <br />disturbance and would be expected to improve the existing quality of <br />runoff leaving the minesite. No mine pit water or water from underground <br />workings would be discharged through Pond E. Therefore, the activities <br />considered in this technical revision would not cause material damage to <br />the surface and ground water that supply the potential alluvial valley <br />floors. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.