APPCOR10459 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

If the plan maps have been incorrectly labeled, the proper terminology should be given in a revised narrative with reference to the appropriate maps. A justification for leaving the coal shown on the two geologic cross-sections would then be required as this would not be in the interest of Maximum Economic Recovery (MER). It would be our contention that the Wadge coal can be mined much closer to the gulch if the coal quality is favorable. In addition, the line referred to as Wadge outcrop (cropline) that somewhat parallels the top of the ridge, does not appear to be the true outcrop. Based on a Wadge overburden map constructed by our geologists, the true outcrop should be from one hundred (100) to two hundred (200) feet further up the hillside. It would seem that the lines shown on the application maps may better be termed "Wadge cropline recovery". This would reflect low quality unrecovered coal to be left between the aforementioned recovery line and the true cropline. If this is the case, the applicant needs to provide written clarification and justification in regard to this matter. If the terminology should require change, it can be cited in their revised and/or supplemental narrative with reference to the maps. In this way the maps can be left unchanged. C.) 43 CFR 3482.1 (c) (7) .."If a coal bed, or portion thereof, is not to a mine or is to be rendered unminable by the operation, the operator/lessee shall submit appropriate justification to the authorized officer for approval." Exhibits 6-5 and 12-1 show the Lennox coal seam within the proposed mining area at strippable depths. However, no,justification is presented for not recovering this coal. If justification can be satisfactorily made at this time for not mining the Lennox, it must not preclude the possibility of its recovery at some later date according to an approved mine plan amendment. h