Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Rule 2.04.7 (4) (b) <br />The applicant should submit a revised map which shows the location of <br />all monitoring wells to be used in the proposed ground water monitoring <br />program. Currently, Map 9 does not show the location of the Fish Creek <br />aquifer wells, well 001-5-10, and well 006-82-38. <br />Rule 2.04.7(4)(f) <br />Map 9 shows a "Dewatering Well" in the southeast corner of Section 29. <br />The applicant should provide a description regardirx~ the proposed <br />function of this well. It is assumed that this well is completed in the <br />reclaimed spoils aquifer and will be used to intercept spoils water before <br />it reaches the proposed portal area. Zf this is the case, the applicant <br />should provide an estimate of expected pumping rates, expected water <br />quality, and a description of how the water will be handled and where <br />discharge will occur. The probable hydrologic consequences of the discharge <br />of this water should also be analyzed. <br />Rule 2.05.6(3) (b) (iii) <br />Table 8 should be modified to include the appropriate well data for the <br />Fish Creek alluvial aquifer wells. <br />The applicant should submit a proposal' to monitor water inflows into the <br />proposed mine workings. The proposal should include a plan to measure <br />the flow rates of the various inflows, a method to characterize the type <br />of inflows, and an inflow location map. <br />The applicant should revise the proposed ground water monitoring plan to <br />include quarterly submittal of collected data. <br />Rule 2.05.6(3) (b) (iv) <br />The applicant s?nuld revise his statement of "Probable Hydrologic <br />Consequences" to include an analysis of the potential effects on the <br />Fish Creek alluvial aquifer. This analysis should consider both water <br />quantity and quality impacts. Modeling techniques would be appropriate <br />to facilitiate this analysis. <br />/ep <br />cc: Jim Pendleton <br />Jerry Zimpfer <br />