My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10291
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:41 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Name
LORENCITO CANYON MINE PERMIT REVSION EXHIBIT 8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Rule '_.Ily.; Site Description and Land l se lnforma[inn <br />Under this section. all responses here found adzquare zxcept as lisred bziet~. <br />O~ ~ Lorencito Coal Compam reciszd pagz 2.0-1-_' to rztiect land usz capabilities and <br />producti~ in'. Lorencito Coal Compam statzs that the irrigated ha~'land tcithin the permit <br />aria gznzralh produces l wn of hav per acre pzr cutting. This productit itc let zl assumes <br />mo cuttings per }'ear. This rzsponsz is acceptable. The Dit ision noted a n pographical zrror <br />on this past. "todat ° teas tcritten as "toadv° in thz last sentznez. <br />Res~nse <br />The typographical zrror on page 2.Oq-3 has been corrected. <br />Rule 2.0~.~ Cultural and Historic Resource lnformation <br />31. The report ~cas indezd recut ed bt both thz Division and Stare Historic Preservation Ofticer <br />(SHPO). SHPO responded [o the Division on iVlarch _' l . 1997 afrzr ret iztc of this report. It <br />~(~ is our understanding that the applicant is proceeding kith im esti~zation of sites as listed b~' <br />// SHPO or ~t'ill outline a plan for in~esti~ation for those sites ~chich trill not be affectzd zarly <br />in thz ~-t'zar pemtit temt. _~t this [ime. the response to this question remains inadequate. <br />• Responsz <br />Cultural resource investigations hate peen completed and a repon is included that discusszs <br />thz results of dtz investigations (see attached). This report ryas submittzd to SHPO under <br />separa[e cover for concurrencz. Cultural resource clearancz is' rcommended for all sites <br />~~ ttitltin the initial development plan of the project ttith exczption of onz cultural sitz <br />'t5 ,~ (~LA7136 located at the mouth of Lorencito Canon). A separatz treatment plan for this site <br />~~2 • ~ has been dzyzloped that has also been sent to SHPO for concurrence (see attached 1. ~Ve <br />anucipare that SHPO ~yill respond to those reports in a short pzriod of time. The treatment <br />plan for this site should be completed within 30 days of approval of the plan. As a result. <br />LCC requests that thz Division find that consu'uction of the project be .~Ilott'ed to begin in <br />all areas except tyithin thz boundan ofthis site. Both cultural document .should be placed <br />in Exhibit ~. Culntral Resources of thz permit. <br />Rule 2.O~.S General Descri~ttion of Geolom and Hvdrnlo~ <br />Under this section. all responses Mere found adequate zxcept as listed belotc. <br />~. This response is inadequate. i`;o tchere on [hz geologt map is therz am thins closz to 700 <br />6\L feet of separation beatezn the Cintela and the Primero seams. z~:en in the southzm portion <br />of the permit area. Plzasz reviett thz original question and correct this information as <br />• necessary . <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.