Laserfiche WebLink
• Rule 4.17 Air Resource Protection <br />The response to question 197 is adequate. The application is in compliance with Rule 4.17. <br />The responses to questions 198 and 199 aze adequate. Currently, the Division is evaluating the <br />comments of the Division of Wildlife with regazd to the issues as identified in their letters received <br />May 16, 1997 and May 28, 1997. Many of the issues fall under various categories of water quality <br />and revegetation. However, DMG will summarize and focus the issues under the framework of their <br />direct comments and cite Rules as necessary. <br />Response <br />No response is necessary at this time. However, a response to the Division's June 5, 1997 <br />letter summarizing CDOW's concerns will be presented under sepazate cover. <br />Rule 4.19 Protection of Underground Mining <br />200. The applicant's response is adequate. However, if the IviSHA/DMG-Mine Safety and <br />Training Programjoint approval of the application to conduct surface coat mining within 500 <br />\ feet of the active underground mine is not provided to the DMG Coal Program prior to the <br />• ~ Coal Program's proposed decision to approve the application, the Coal Program will <br />stipulate the mine application's approval that the MSHA/IvfSTP approved plan be submitted <br />io the Coal Program prior to surface operations beginning. <br />Response <br />S~1Q ~'1 The MSHA/MSTP will be completed by the contractors hired to conduct the mining <br />activities and these contractors will not be hired until the permit has been issued. Therefore, <br />the Division should include this stipulation in their findings. <br />Rule 3.02.2 Reclamation Cost Estimate <br />The Division is currently completing review of the reclamation cost estimate information. We <br />anticipate being able to identify any remaining issues by June ~. 1997. <br />J~ Unnumbered. The Division requested changes to Tables 2.04.7-2, 2.04.7-3, and GW-10 as they <br />were producing the PHC. Page 2.04=27 ended up with one change as a <br />consequence of those changes. Those revisions have been made and are included <br />in this submittal. <br />LCC has completed stability evaluations for the P3 and Rl Portals. This analysis has been included <br />in Exhibit 13. <br />. This concludes LLC's adequacy response. <br />34 <br />