Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Ibrt. ~ Ulle1T and ufi.:~l calculations •.:zrz r: ~.~ie«zd. Discrepancies ll lllCli reni : P. 1Ce SS Jll~".1 ~: <br />Road drainage <br />Jeff Canon Haulroad <br />The Division believes the intlo« to culvert 12479 ~~ould be 223.E cfs rather than <br />1 X6.71. Pleaue review and correct. <br />Corr to R portals <br />The following original questions still apply: <br />cul~ ert at 333+92, calculations sav 30", table says 24" <br />* culvert at 333+92. 24" size is inaccurate <br />~~ <br />d~~ <br />Response <br />Jeff Canyon Haul Road <br />LCC will review the sizing for culvert 124+79 for the next submittal. <br />~v~to R Portals <br />~~ A moditication has been made to the table entry for Cow Canyon Ditches and Culverts to <br />© indicare that the culvert at 3.3+9'_ is 30". <br />Rule 4.US.10 Underground iViine Entn 3 Access Discharge <br />/The response to question f bd is adequate. The application is incompliance with Rule -i.0~.10. <br />Rule 4.OS.13 Surface and Groundwater ~[onitorinQ <br />Under this section, all responses were found adequate except as listed below. <br />•67~ This response is inadequate. Please refer to the original question and re~ ie~c spring names, <br />D locations. and proposed mme plan. <br />Response <br />Table 2.05.6-~ on page '_.0~-97 indicates that drawdown distances associa[ed with the <br />Primero seam could ranee from 6294' - 19076' depending on saturated thickness and <br />. extent of mining. SPAC-1 will be retained in the first permit term monitorine plan. as it <br />is 6000' - 9000' away from minins activities in P1 and P2. SPCC-1 will be retained as it <br />29 <br />