Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-2- <br />11. The monitoring plan has been stipulated, the requested map has been <br />inserted, and a statement of why complete analyses are not required has <br />been added to the document. <br />12. a. The ground water PHC has been revised as requested. <br />b. The statement on page 25 was erroneous and has been clarified. <br />13. As stated on page 23 and elsewhere in the document, "the applicant's <br />limited coal extraction method should prevent significant subsidence." <br />The applicant has proposed a subsidence control plan to prevent material <br />damage, a monitoring program to verify mechanical and hydrologic <br />projections, and has committed to rehabilitate or reconstruct any <br />affected structures. These plans are discussed in detail to Section XXIV <br />of the application. <br />In summary, some subsidence is probable over the long term, but due to <br />the control plan, any effects are expected to be minor and easily <br />reparable. <br />14. Information on the 4th spring was submitted in Volume 12. The findings <br />document has been revised accordingly. <br />15. A stipulation requiring the operator to obtain necessary air quality <br />permits prior to exceeding 400,000 T/Y has been added to the findings <br />document. <br />16. The requested discussion has been provided. <br />17. The requested discussion has been provided. <br />Doc. 0261E <br />