My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10280
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10280
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:41 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:09:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/29/1984
Doc Name
RED CANYON MIEN PERMIT REVIEW FN C-034-81
From
MLRD
To
OSM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />COMMENTS ON DRAFT FINDINGS <br /> <br />1. The stlpulatlon now specifies that sediment control structures are the <br /> pot entially non-complying structu res. The rationale for the stlpulatlon <br /> is stated on page 13 of the draft ftndings. <br />2. An up-to-date coal ownership map is provided as Drawing No. 203.4(5)-2 <br /> 1n volume 7 of the application. The map does show Federal Coal in the <br /> SWl /4, SW1/4 Section 12, which is leased to Grand Mesa Coal Company. <br />3. The document has been modlfted as requested. <br />4. The document has been modified as requested. <br />5. The document has been modified as requested. <br />6. a. A discussion of the "D" seam analyses has been added on page 12. <br />b. The analyses presented in Appendix A of Volume 10 are for the "D" <br />seam, not the "E" seam. The consultant's report in Volume 10 <br />incorrectly refers to "E" and "F" coal seams, rather than "D" and <br />"E" coal seams. Since the "D" seam outcrop is approximately 100 <br />feet stratigraphlcally below the "E" seam, and the "D" seam outcrop <br />is several hundred feet to the south of the "E" seam outcrop, <br />analyses provided should be representative. The applicant has <br />revised Appendix A to point out the seam identification error. <br />c. "E" seam sulfur analyses were submitted in the May 8, 1981, reviston <br />to Volume 2 of the application, but the table was not clearly <br />labeled. (See table Tabled 2.04.6(2)(a)(1v)(D) Included 1n Volume <br />12.) "D" seam roof, floor, interburden and coal analyses are <br />contained in Appendix A of Volume 10 of the application. <br />7. The document has been modified as requested. <br />8. Stipulation No. 1 has been modified. <br />9. The document has been modified as requested. <br />10. a. The ground water monitoring requirements have been clartfted and <br />stipulated. Annual monitoring for pH, EC and temperature has been <br />stipulated for deep rock and alluvial wells. <br />b. The "expected rise in TDS described on pages 23 and 24 borders on <br />'material damage'" to potable water supplies. Grand Mesa's plan <br />addresses replacement of potable water supplies by means of the <br />Colby domestic water system. The recently submitted Volume 12 <br />provides additional details regarding the replacement plan and, as a <br />result, draft stipulation No. 8 has been deleted and the text of <br />Section VIII of the findings document has been revised. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.