Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 3- <br />Soine of the revisions are minor in nature and involve changes to maps and <br />narrative as a result of previous revisions. For example, CYCC has <br />revised the pennit boundary through previous revisions and bond release. <br />However, the pennit boundary legal description has not been revised or a <br />map presented showing the entire current permit boundary. The purpose of <br />this revision will be to consolidate all the changes in the permit <br />boundary to date. Other revisions may be technical in nature. <br />All revisions should be in a form that can be inserted into the permit <br />application. I suggest that the revisions be submitted by December 1, <br />1983. That way the Division can review them with the goal of completing <br />the midterm review and state program compliance by the end of the year. <br />If this is not a feasible schedule, please contact the Division. As you <br />know, I will be gone in November, but Bob Liddle will be handling this <br />mine. <br />I would appreciate any additions, suggestions, or comments you may have <br />regarding this review. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Sandra Emrich <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />SE/ep <br />cc: D.L. Damrau (without attachments) <br />Floyd Johnson, OSM (without attachments) <br />Attachments <br />~~ <br />I <br />i <br />i <br />Doc. No. 6171 <br />