My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10255
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10255
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:40 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:09:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
10/27/1983
Doc Name
STATUS OF PN 79-177
From
MLRD
To
COLO YAMPA COAL CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.. <br />_17_ <br />To properly evaluate the bond, the Division needs to determine the cost <br />for the worst case remaining reclamation work at Eckman Park. It will be <br />more efficient to recalculate the reclamation costs than use the <br />previously calculated costs as a basis because of mine plan revisions and <br />the fact that some of the reclamation has occurred. Therefore, <br />backfilling/grading costs for Areas 9/10, 41, 51 and 60, the ponds, <br />roads, and facilities areas, plus topsoiling and revegetating costs for <br />those areas must be determined. Costs will be based on outside <br />contractors cost as the Division would do should the operator default on <br />the reclamation plan. CYCC shall submit adjusted reclamation costs based <br />on the revisions to the permit and the reclamation required for the <br />largest disturbance area during the remainder of the permit term. <br />XVIII. Seali <br />of Drilled Holes and Und <br />q an <br />round Ooenings - Rules <br />There are no substantive differences between the permanent Federal and <br />State regulations. <br />This section is in compliance. <br />XI X. Subsidence - Rules 2.05.6(6) nd 4.20 <br />This section was not addressed in the Eckman Park permit application. In <br />the Foidel Creek permit revision application, this sections was addressed <br />and reviewed by the Division. <br />This section is in compliance. <br />XX. Miscellaneous Com liance - Rules 2.05.6(5), 4.02, 4.12, 4.19, <br />.28 an <br />There are no substantive differences between the federal and state <br />permanent regulations in these section. <br />This section is in compliance. <br />XXI. Operations on Lands Subject to Limitations or Prohibitions - <br />a~~~~T~ n <br />There are no substantive differences between the Federal and State <br />permanent regulations. <br />The application is in compliance. <br />XXII. Demonstration that Surface Coal Mining and Reclam3}ion <br />Operations can be Feasib y Accomplished -Rule 2.07.6(Z)(b) <br />There are no substantive changes between the Federal and State permanent <br />regulations to change this. <br />This section is in compliance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.