Laserfiche WebLink
.x <br />~ ~ ~ ~) <br />3. 3/30/82: Alleged violation is vacated (storm ex- <br />emption). <br />C. Total suspended solids monthly average effluent limita- <br />tions ("TSS Monthly"). <br />1. 3/82: Alleged violation is vacated (storm exemp- <br />tion). <br />D. Total iron daily effluent limitations ("Daily Iron") <br />1. 3/19/82: Alleged violation is vacated (storm ex- <br />emption). <br />E. Total iron monthly average effluent limitations <br />("Monthly Iron"): <br />1. 3/82: Alleged violation is vacated (storm exemp- <br />tion). <br />III. Discharge Point 3 (corresponds to CYCC Mine 1 Pond B) <br />A. Verification of construction is accepted as timely. <br />IV. Discharge Point 4 (corresponds to CYCC Mine 1 Pond C) <br />A. Verification of construction is accepted as timely. <br />V. Discharge Point 5 (corresponds to CYCC Mine 1 Pond D) <br />A. Verification of construction is accepted as timely. <br />VI. Discharge Point 6 (corresponds to CYCC Mine 1 Pond E) <br />A. Verification of construction is accepted as timely. <br />VII. Discharge Point 7 (corresponds to CYCC Mine 1 Pond F) <br />A. Verification of construction is accepted as filed on <br />November 6, 1982. <br />B. TSS Daily: <br />1. The samples taken on 3/4/82, 3/9/82, 4/5/82, and <br />4/13/82 showed TSS in excess of 70 mg/1. These <br />discharges occurred because a sedimentation pond <br />had not been constructed at the times these sam- <br />ples were taken. A structure had been approved by <br />-3- <br />