Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the coefficient of determination (a measure of the closeness <br />of the data points to the line or the fraction of the total <br />variation in s/Qw that is accounted for by the regression). <br />The "r" used in the steady state assumption equation (lower <br />part of the data sheets) is always set: equal to one foot and <br />represents the distance from the center of the pumping well at <br />which the dra~~rdown measurements were made. <br />d. A table has ]peen provided at the front of Appendix 7-3 to <br />clarify which. wells were the pumpincf wells during aquifer <br />tests. The pumping wells for any given aquifer test are the <br />monitoring site listed corresponding to a specific date. On <br />the typed test data sheets, the pumping well in those cases <br />where multiple, proximate wells were analyzed (YOV3 and YOV4, <br />YL5 and YL6, YOV1 and YW2, YOV28-Y'i7U28, YOV29-YWU29, and <br />YOV30-YWU30) is always the one identified by its site ID over <br />the "discharge reading" column which contains discharge data <br />for each corresponding time and/or the correct site ID for the <br />pumping well is identified at the top of the page. <br />N/A Text and table changes have been madfa for the Surface Water <br />Suitability information presented on Pages 106 through 120. <br />These changes were made to address errors in the original <br />interpretation of domestic, irrigation, and livestock water <br />use standards. See insertion instructions for the page <br />changes. <br />~~ N/A During the February 1, 1995 meeting between SCC and CDMG <br />personnel in Denver, the CDMG requested SCC to describe and <br />qualify limitations of stilling well communication ports. SCC <br />has revised the "Sage Creek" :subsection within the <br />"Streamflow" section of Tab 7 to provide this clarification. <br />Tab 12 - Coal Resource Recovery Plan <br />26. Potential landslide areas recognized key the Division have been <br />delineated on Exhibit 6-1, Site Specif=ic Geology. These areas <br />will be field verified during the ].995 field season. The <br />mining plan was updated to address potentially unstable areas <br />and active 1¢indslide areas during the mining operations. The <br />Division specified three particular areas of concern with only <br />one being in the first permit term. The potential unstable <br />area noted by the Division on the west upper slopes and gulch <br />of the Pond 11 drainage is not within the current mine plan <br />boundary and should not present any problems. The monitoring <br />road to Pond 11 has also been removed. Therefore, Seneca does <br />not feel this area will be affected at the present time. It <br />is also understood that should any landslides occur, the <br />Division wi].1 be notified immediately and a monitoring and <br />remediation plan submitted for approval and implementation. <br />Tab 13 - Facilities <br />27a. Rock outcroF~ has been assigned a curve number of 98. These <br />6 <br />