Laserfiche WebLink
Bob Liddle -S- December 2, 1981 <br />9) The proximity of the coal processing waste pile and its associated <br />sediment pond to North Thompson Creek, along with the ground water communication <br />of the unconsolidated materials under the pile and sediment pond with the North <br />Thompson Creek alluvium warrants a detailed evaluation of their impacts on ground <br />and surface water quality. The impacts of the coal processing waste pile on <br />the ground and surface water quality has been inadequately addressed and <br />monitored. Previous studies conducted by Snowmass were deemed inadequate (see <br />memo of July 8, 1980). These studies were to be redone once a monitoring well <br />was installed and monitored upstream of the pile. These studies were never <br />submitted to the Division. Monitoring of water levels in monitoring wells located <br />around the pile and pond,and the quality of ground water in these wells were <br />required under the interim permit approval of the permit amendment in order to monitc~~ <br />the effects of mining on the hydrologic balance and to determine conformance with <br />the applicable performance standards. Monitoring of these wells will be required <br />during and after mining until bond release to monitor conformance. Therefore, <br />the ground water monitoring section of the permit should contain a description <br />of monitoring of these wells. <br />10) R ground and surface water monitoring plan should be submitted and <br />ifmnediately initiated along Middle Thompson Creek. Ground water quality and <br />quantity monitoring along this creek should include alluvial wells downstream <br />of the outcrop of the Rollins sandstone, over the coal subcrop and upstream of <br />the area to be undermined, and within the angle of draw. Surface water stations <br />should be installed up and down stream of areas to be effected by mining. The <br />data gathered from this monitoring should serve as a baseline and as a monitor <br />of the effects of mining in the quality and quantity of surface and ground water <br />within Middle Thompson Creek. The data gathered should be used in the description <br />of the prevailing hydrologic balance and of the consequence of mining on water <br />rights and on the hydrologic balance. <br />II) Data on water levels and water quality from bedrock monitoring wells <br />were not continued after the initial aquifer testing was concluded on these wells. <br />This monitoring was agreed to and was included within the approved interim permit <br />amendment. The result of this lack of monitoring is a Lack of data needed for <br />the applicant to adequately assess the seasonal fluctuation of the quality and <br />quantity of ground water and to adequately assess the hydrologic consequences of <br />mining on ground water quality and quantity within the bedrock aquifers. Since <br />these wells monitor permeable strata above the mine which are in hydrologic <br />communication with the alluvial and surface waters of North Thompson Creek, data <br />from these wells is necessary in assessing depletion of ground water from these <br />bedrock aquifers, of ground water from the North Thompson Creek alluvium, and of <br />surface water flowing in North Thompson Creek. <br />The ground water monitoring section should include monitoring of the quality and <br />quantity of water from the bedrock wells located on the surface and within the <br />mine. Once a year's worth of contiguous data has been collected according to <br />parameters on Attachment B, Snowmass may petition the Division for a reduction <br />in the number of parameters analyzed, the frequency of sampling and the number <br />of sites sampled. <br />