My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10133
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10133
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:33 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:08:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981026
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
7/28/1981
Doc Name
ADDENDUM I - RESPONSE TO PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW COMMENTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
` ~~~ <br />This figure would be for an average year. It is possible <br />that during a year of extremely poor snowpack that surface <br />water originating within the basin is essentially zero. <br />The past winter of 1980-1981 is an example of this. <br />The maximum amount of trans-basin water diverted into the <br />Bolton Draw watershed by the Speer Ditch can also be <br />estimated by the following expression: <br />(65 days)(60 sec)(60 min)(24 hrs)~11.5 ft3) <br />min hr day Sec <br />43,560 acre 1,483 acre-ft <br />Hence, depending on whether average snow conditions prevail, <br />the ratio of the amount of available water contributed by <br />the basin vs. the amount contributed by the Speer Ditch <br />under maximum possible usage for the normal irrigation per- <br />iod (+ 65 days) is about 758:258. However, during an <br />abnormally dry winter (such as 1980-1981) it is entirely <br />possible that the ratio is nearly 0$:1008. In either event, <br />it has been previously documented in the permit application <br />on Page 92 that "...only 2.78 of the potential surface water <br />flow to the Bolton Draw drainage will be reduced by sediment: <br />pond detention from the Canadian Strip Mine." <br />It was previously stated on Page 112 that "Studies concern- <br />ing the potential areas of subirrigation were limited to <br />the North Fork of Bolton Draw. Certain downstream regions <br />of Main Bolton Draw are undoubtedly subirrigated to a certai <br />extent, especially immediately downstream of the Bolton Dr ac. <br />stock reservoir." The importance of subirrigation in Main <br />Bolton Draw is limited to providing an available water <br />supply both within and adjacent to the active stream channe] <br />which helps promote native vegetation within the draw. <br />Subirrigation within Main Bolton Draw is not important from <br />an agricultural usage standpoint. This fact has been pre- <br />viously documented on Page 111 which states that "According <br />to Mr. John Nuding, manager of the nearby Noffsinger Ranch, <br />the soil in Bolton Draw is not suited for crops as hay <br />because of its poor characteristics (mainly high clay con- <br />tent)." This statement has been reconfirmed by the <br />unpublished document "Soil Survey of Jackson County, <br />Colorado" referred to on Page 10 of this Addendum. Further <br />information concerning soil characteristics and vegetation <br />types in this vicinity (Spicerton series) may be found in <br />the discussion on Page 10 of this Addendum. <br />Wyoming Fuel Company has previously documented the minimal <br />impact that the proposed mining operations will have on the <br />downstream reaches of Main Bolton Draw. Tltis information m~ <br />be found in the prediction of probable hydrologic conseq- <br />uences, Section 2.05.6(3)(b)(iv) pages 92-99. In this <br />discussion and summary, it is evident that the surface <br />water contribution to Bolton Draw is of considerably greater <br />importance than the groundwater contribution. Also, <br />-12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.