Laserfiche WebLink
• 8. <br />~v <br /> <br />9 <br />~{P~110 <br />asks that <br />submitting <br />informatio <br />correction <br /> <br />SCC made an incorrect statement in the initial response to <br />this adequacy comment. There are two correction factors you <br />can directly input into the FPC program, in addition to the <br />operator efficiency factor. These factors are for: a speed <br />correction and an altitude correction. Because SCC received <br />the updated version of the FPC program instead of the older <br />version that Peabody Western personnel used in the initial <br />bond estimate in September 1994, this fact became evident. <br />The initial FPC input file was loaded and converted for <br />acceptance into the newer version of FPC. Before changing the <br />operator efficiency to .75 which the Division requested, the <br />initial input was calculated again for comparison purposes to <br />see if any differences occurred between the old and updated <br />versions of the program. When examining the new output, the <br />two input correction factors were printed on the Travel Time <br />and Speeds Reports. The Division will notice when comparing <br />these revised reports with what is currently contained in the <br />permit application package, that an altitude correction factor <br />of .89 was utilized for the topsoil replacement activities. <br />Because the Division requested SCC to incorporate an altitude <br />adjustment factor of .91 in their January 24, 1995 letter, SCC <br />Course <br />you accept what is calculated already. SCC is <br />the revised output since it does show all input <br />n that was not shown originally. You can see the <br />factors on the following pages: <br />Haul <br />Return <br />A 25-6-16 25-6-17 <br />B 25-6-18 25-6-19 <br />C 25-6-20 25-6-21 <br />D 25-6-22 25-6-23 <br />E 25-6-24 25-6-25 <br />G 25-6-26 25-6-27 <br />H 25-6-28 25-6-29 <br />SCC still preparing response. <br />No response required from SCC. <br />20. The shrubs/tree seedling planting acres in Table 25-5-1 have <br />8~ been increased to account for the three acres of aspen and the <br />additional shrub and tree establishment sites. The only seed <br />mix change was a slight increase in the seeding rate of basin <br />wildrye. No increase in cost for the seed mix was calculated <br />because the amount would be negligible. In the original cost <br />estimate for the seed mixes, a higher value for each component <br />was estimated for based on the variability and market price <br />for individual seed. <br />• 6 <br />