My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10020
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:27 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:06:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984065
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
5/16/1984
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW MEMO
From
SUSAN MOWRY
To
JIM HERRON
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-3- <br />Protection of Public Parks and Historic Places -Rule 2.05.6(4 <br />1. On page 4-gl of the permit application occurs a discussion of a parcel <br />of land whose intended use appears to be a public park. Is this the same <br />parcel denoted as "Park land" on Figure 3.1-1 and as belonging to Garfield Co. <br />Commissioners on Figure 2.1-4? If so a reference to either of these maps <br />should be added to the narrative on page 4-91. <br />Maps and Plans - Rule 2.10 <br />1. Figure 4.2-2 should have the 5 year permit boundary delineated on it. <br />2. The applicant should submit maps which indicate mineral ownership. <br />3. The 5 year permit boundary is incorrectly delineated on Figures 3.3-11, <br />3.3-12, and 5.1-11. <br />4. A map should be submitted or an existing map revised to indicate the <br />proposed surface disturbance boundary, the 5 year permit boundary, the <br />affected area for the first 5 year permit, and the permit and affected area <br />boundaries for each successive 5 year permit term through the life of the mine. <br />5. Figure 4.2-19 indicates a boundary for surface facilities in Areas I and <br />II. This boundary is also indicated on Figure 4.2-3. The boundary as drawn <br />does not include the sediment pond for the load-out among other facilities. <br />The boundary must be revised and remapped to include all surface facilities <br />and then denoted as the surface disturbance boundary in the legend. <br />6. Figures 4.2-19, 4.2-20, 4.2-21, 4.2-22, 4.2-23, 4.2-24, 4.2-25, and <br />4.2-26 are all stamped "Preliminary". The Division cannot issue a decision <br />using preliminary maps. <br />7. The surface disturbance boundary should be indicated on Figure 5.1-2. <br />8. Is Mr. Sam S. Arentz a registered P.E. in Colorado. If so, his seal and <br />number should be added to his certification of Figures 3.1-4, 3.1-5, 3.3-6, <br />3.3-7, 4.1-3, 4.1-4, 4.1-5 which must also be signed, 4.2-1, 4.2-2, 4.2-3, <br />4.2-4, 4.2-5, 4.2-6, 4.2-7, 4.2-8, and 4.2-27. <br />9. Several maps bear certification by someone other than a professional <br />engineer or professional geologist. According to Rule 2.10.3(2) this is not <br />acceptable. Therefore, Figures 2.1-1, 2.1-2, 2.1-3, 2.1-4, 3.1-1, 3.1-2, <br />3.1-3, 3.5-1, and 3.6-1 must be re-certified by a professional engineer or <br />professional geologist. An example of appropriate language for map <br />certification is included at the end of this document. <br />Signs and Markers -Rule 4.02 <br />1. The applicant should commit to complying with the requirements of Rule <br />4.02. <br />/th <br />Doc. No. 1576 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.