Laserfiche WebLink
`,., <br />• ~~~~\\2' • M-H`~-027 <br />RECEIVED <br />To Whom It May Concern: MAR 2 8 2001 <br />Divisional Minerals and Geology <br /> <br /> <br />I aim writing this letter with my concerns about the <br />Camas U:~R 877 and USR 1046 permits. As you can see from my <br />scaled map, I live in the middle of the Camas USRs. <br />What I would Like to say first, I am not opposed to <br />responsi_b1e mining, I am opposed to unresponsible mining. <br />Reviewing the map you can see that a possible 3.5 miles <br />of rive~• ( St. Vrain and Boulder Creek) will be disrupted <br />for 15-::0 years, not including the 14yrs. to present. I must <br />say agian I am not opposed to responsible mining. As you <br />can see on the map, a yellow marker showing the conveyer system <br />from C.I~.Rd.#1 to the east end of section 16. This is my <br />opposition. Why as a property owner do we have to deal with <br />.t.:; <br />this ne€;ative impact. This does not have to~M1happen':'The USR <br />877 permit needs to be reclaimed, then the USR 1046 should <br />be mined. To have the St. Vrain-Boulder Creek confluence <br />mined at: the same time, it is to hard on the enviroment. <br />As neighbors, we have battled with the effects of the mining. <br />AIR QUALITY, NOISE, TRAFFIC, NEGATIVE PROPERTY VALUES, <br />ENVIROMf'.NTAL EFFECTS, not to mention miles of unreclaimed <br />river bottom. This is not an attempt to stop the mining, <br />it is arr attempt to get it under control before its to late. <br />The State of Colorado 34-32-102 Legislative Declaration <br />is not being conveyed to myself my family and or my neighbors. <br />Please take a close look at my concerns: <br />Thanks Ted L. Cox <br />1767 WCR 20.5 <br />Longmont, Co 80504 <br />cc DMG t4ichael Long <br />cc DOW ]marry Rogstad <br />cc Longmont City Council Marty Block <br />cc Weld Co. Planning Ann Johnson <br />~, <br />t <br />