Laserfiche WebLink
%,, . <br />iraae si <br />MJ.N~ 1U 7F Gti 1'RV.iiu~,Ti::v IT ti M_1 Qy'1-1145 <br />INSPECTION DATB 09/27/04 <br />M~t99a•O~j5 <br />r nt5 p <br />iNSPl;i:'1'Vit`S Ii:ITIl-.T.,C 8°P <br />The £^llc:•:ing problems (PB} anujor possible :iela*_jons (vvi (auu yuygaatcd cor='_^-*'i"A <br />_an3? z~ere identified during this inspection. 'ihe proictiecaa should bs c -erred by the <br />dater 3=`•°^• or they will become possible violations. iue possible vicle*_?onG ehnuld be <br />ecrrected by the dates given to reduce their severity wiiei: cc ;aidered by the Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board. The inspector noted on the previous page shcxad be `+otified of all <br />cerrPrtive actions taken. <br />PRA$L8l6S/80$STHL'a YZOLATLOA'S <br />Alv-Fi <br />CORRSCTYVB AGt30i1o^ <br /> DATE <br />1. PROBLEM: <br />The permit boundary markers iratal led by *_he operator do not PB or PV:PB <br />reflect the appcova peY~i.it area of 3 _=.crea in size. .._. ..._ TOPIC (S):MP <br />_ . , , .... --. 11/30 04 <br />CO1iR&CTIYr: ACiIvi+: <br />Amenn the 110(2; pcrrt:it zppL'cet'on to properly reflect the <br />permit area of 3.s acres. Currently, the markers delineate the <br />permit seas tc be 3.° ar_res rather than the approved 3.0 acres. <br />Suuii amend.-„err mst be reC!+ived bv_ the Division on or before <br />ivciVemvar 3C, 2C^^_. <br />i . FRO3L$dd: PB or PV : P$ <br />T:.z reclamaticn ;?lap does noC address reclamation of the <br />r..:.inteaarce ti,~;; l.dina. TOPIC (S1 :SF <br /> 11/30/04 <br />coDsacT*_~.~ neTTnx: <br />Address the reclamation of the maintenance building in lue <br />amendment. application so that the Division can calculate a test <br />to remove the structure. Zf the building is to remain as a <br />component of the poatmining land use, then approval must bc^ <br />documented by the Local Land use authority by Ivoveal;ar 30, zesa. <br />PROBLEM: <br />The mining attd reclamation plan does not address the cast= pi I? P$ or PV:Pa <br />created by the operator. TftPIC(S? :BaP <br />11/30/04 <br />CORRECTIVE ACTION: <br />Address the Creation and- reclamation oP the xsste pile noted on <br />site. If the pile is to remain in place, the ereratnr will need to <br />address reclamation of the cut slope ir. the charme7 to ultimately <br />achieve a 3hav slope. Tf ek.is issue is not addressed bv_ the <br />operator, then the Division will ,...rise the reclamation coat <br />estimate to move the pile back to theYc~ut =lopes to achieve a 3h av <br />slope as so ttoteci iii the reclamation plan. This should be <br />submitted with item Y,1 ...;red shove. <br />PROBLl3M <br />D <br />The operator is utilising :•rater in the creek for the mining °r ' <br />OperatiUtl, `OUt ha'o uOt c'._bmittRd the apprODTi.ate dOCnmentati.OII ToP=_C (S1 sAB <br />to tFie D<vision. liLn~U4 <br />CGRRECTZCE .^.CTlnrt. <br />Darucnatratc that the operator is in compliance with the permit <br />sad applicable Colorado Water Lawa regarding the use and <br />exposars of wn*er in the Caehe Creek by November 30, 20u4. <br />