Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br />and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />pond construction would be sufficient to moderate runoff flows and prevent accelerated <br />erosion of the native channel segment. The 2004 snowmett runoff is the first such runoff <br />from the entire D Pit regraded watershed area that the channel reach has conveyed. The <br />Division will periodically monitor the condition of the channel reach, until an effective <br />permanent vegetation cover has become established over the entire "D" Pit reclaimed area. <br />Appropriate enforcement may be taken if significant additional channel erosion is <br />documented. <br />During this inspection, the same areas of the channel were observed as had been observed <br />in the fall of 2003, and digital photos were taken in many of the same approximate <br />locations. Focus of re-inspection was on areas of previous head-cutting, which appeared to <br />be susceptible to further headword erosion. In the narrative below, italicized text is from <br />the September 30, 2003 inspection report. Comments based on observations made on <br />April 27, 2004 are in bold. <br />The channel currently appears to be relatively stable, but it runs a/ong the toe of a <br />hillslope to the north that has been subject to landslides in the past, and renewed <br />downcutting along the channe/ would likely trigger additional sliding. There are a <br />number of nickpoints a/ong the channel with head-cutting erosion, most of which <br />looks fair/y o/d, but some evidence of additional cutting in the /ast few years. <br />Based on observation and comparison of photographs, there appears to have been <br />relatively minimal additional down-cutting or headword erosion, and no new <br />landslide activity on slopes adjacent to the channel is evident. <br />At this /ocation [lower end of the channel segment just upstream from the stock <br />pond), a road outlet ditch that had eroded and was subsequent/y backfilled last <br />spring [2003], emptied into the channel. <br />The short channel reach between the stock pond and the Road G outlet ditch is <br />depicted on September 2003 Photo #751 and April 2004 Photo #1018. There may <br />have been minor scour in the segment below the ditch outlet this spring. The road <br />outlet ditch itself had eroded again this spring, and grading repairs had been <br />initiated. Riprap will need to be installed along the length of the road outlet ditch, <br />and should be continued for some distance down the channel segment toward the <br />stock pond, to prevent undercutting. <br />There is a notable n/ckpoint approximately 100 yards up the channel from the 751 <br />photo point. At this location there is a steep sided gully segment up to 15 feet <br />deep, approximately 20 feet in length, varying from 6 inches to 7 feet wide /Photos <br />752 through 7551. <br />There may have been some apparently minor additional scour along the previously <br />entrenched 100 yard segment upstream from the ditch outlet confluehce, but it is <br />difficult to say with certainty, due to the fact that photo points were not exactly the <br />2 <br />