My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC43035
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC43035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:46:31 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:29:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
4/27/2004
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br />and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a complete inspection of the Seneca II-W Mine for the 2n0 Quarter 2004, <br />conducted by Dan Mathews of the DMG Grand Junction Field Office. Roy Karo, <br />Reclamation Manager for Seneca Coal Company (SCC), was present during the inspection. <br />Field inspection was initiated the morning of Apri{ 27 and concluded the evening of April <br />29. Office records were checked on the morning of April 30. Weather during the <br />inspection was clear and mild, in contrast to the previous week, in which the mine area had <br />received significant precipitation (mixed rain and snow). It was very windy on the 28`". <br />Primary snowmelt in the mine area had occurred in early April. All areas were free of snow <br />and accessible, but there were still muddy conditions in low areas, and there was some <br />flow in most of the larger ephemeral drainages in the permit area, including the primary <br />reclaimed watersheds. <br />The dragline was still operating in the north block of the Wolf Creek/Sage Creek mining <br />area, in the southern extension of the permit area, as it has been for several months. The <br />lower split of the Wolf Creek Seam was being exposed by the dragline at the time of the <br />inspection, with coal loading and hauling operations following closely behind the dragline <br />operation. At the upper end of the Wolf Creek block near the eastern ridgeline, operations <br />are closely approaching the limit of stripped topsoil, and topsoil stripping operations had <br />recently been reinitiated. <br />"D" Pit Native Drainage Channel Assessment <br />The condition of the native drainage channel reach between the "D" Pit regraded areas and <br />the roadside stock tank (T-22) just upstream from Haul Road Culvert G5 was evaluated <br />during the inspection, and numerous photos were taken. The channel runs through areas of <br />unstable surface geology, and there is evidence of past channel incision and bank sloughing. <br />The channel segment was previously checked on September 25, 2003, to document the <br />condition of the channel. The following excerpt is from the Division's September 30, 2003 <br />inspection report. <br />Th/s channel system conveys disturbed runoff from the D"Pit area, but is <br />otherwise undisturbed by mining activities. For over a decade, peak f/ows through <br />this segment of channel were minimized due to the capture of runoff by mine pits <br />and/or diversion of flow via road ditches. The mine pies were backfilled and graded <br />in 2002, and road ditch diversions were eliminated after the 2003 spring <br />runoff... The Division concluded that it would be prudent to document the existing <br />condition of the channe% and we have requested the operator to submit a plan to <br />minimize the potential for excessive erosion of the channel reach that might occur <br />during the early years of reclamation, before the reclaimed watershed is fully <br />stabilized by vegetation. <br />The operator chose not to implement temporary diversions or other measures, due in part to <br />the extensive drainage modifications that would have been required to divert a significant <br />quantity of runoff from the reclaimed portion of the watershed. The operator concluded <br />that reclamation work completed in 2003, including topsoiling, drainage channels, and stock <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.