My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC42710
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC42710
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:46:14 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:27:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
2/15/2007
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Elk Creek C-1981-022 <br />Pg 1/3 15 February 2007 ~~-~ <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations <br />made during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during <br />the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a partial inspection of the Elk Creek and Sanborn Creek Mines conducted by Jim <br />Stark of CDRMS. The inspection was conducted on 15 February 2007. Jim Kiger of Oxbow <br />Mining, LLC accompanied me on the inspection. The mine was not producing coal at the <br />time of the inspection due because they are currently moving the longwall. The weather was <br />cool and cloudy and the ground had some snow and was wet and muddy where there was <br />no snow. <br />Signs and Markers: All of the necessary signs were in place as required. All of the off-site <br />locations that were visited had the appropriate mine ID and disturbance boundary markers as <br />required. <br />Roads: -The mine access road is a paved road. The road is well maintained and in good <br />condition. <br />- The east yard haul road was wet but appeared to be stable and well maintained at the time <br />of the inspection. There were no rutting or erosional problems noted on the road at the time <br />of the inspection. <br />- The road to the Elk Creek portals and facilities area was wet and muddy in spots but <br />appeared to be stable and well maintained at the time of the inspection. No erosional <br />problems were noted on the road at the time of the inspection. <br />- The haul road to the West Valley Fill was wet and muddy at the time of the inspection. The <br />road appeared to be stable and there was no rutting on the road. There was some water <br />flowing on the road in response to the melting snow but no erosional problems were noted <br />on the road. <br />-The haul road to the II-West Valley Fill was inaccessible due to mud at the time of the <br />inspection. <br />-The back entrance to the mine from Highway 133 was wet but appeared to be stable at the <br />time of the inspection. This road is primarily used to access the Sanborn Creek gob vent <br />boreholes and the mine when a train is blocking the main entrance. <br />Hydrologic Balance: - Pond A contained water approximately six inches below the top and <br />was not discharging at the time of the inspection. The pond is an incised pond. The pond <br />was stable at the time of the inspection. <br />- Pond B contained water approximately four feet below the emergency spillway at the time <br />of the inspection but was not discharging (discharge is through a gated valve below the water <br />level). The pond was covered with ice and there were coal fines and mud on top of the ice. <br />The embankment was well vegetated and appeared to be stable. No erosional problems <br />were noted on the pond embankment. The emergency spillway was stable. <br />- Pond C is a concrete dam below the West Valley Fill. The dam appeared to be stable at <br />the time of the inspection. The pond was dry at the time of the inspection. <br />- Pond D contained water approximately to the top of the discharge pipe and was discharging <br />at a rate of approximately 5 GPM at the time of the inspection. The discharge looked clear. <br />The pond embankment was well vegetated and appeared to be stable at the time of the <br />inspection. No erosional problems were noted on the pond embankment. Pond D has an oil <br />boom and it was in place. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.