Laserfiche WebLink
(Page 3) <br />MINE ID JJ OR PROSPECTING ID !/ M-1994-005 <br />INSPECTION DATE 2/23/01 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />manage its natural degradation onsite in a dry location This may be through spreading it thinly over soil or a roadway and <br />tilling it periodically to volatize the hydrocarbons. Please see the last page for the correction date <br />Most recent activities include topsoil stripping from Phase IV, stockpiling some of it along the west edge of that phase, <br />and hauling much of it to the NW floor of Phase I. Native topsoil depth varies, but overall it appears to be a foot deep or <br />more. The approved reclamation plan states that 12 to 18 inches of topsoil depth will be replaced. The operator should <br />endeavor to salvage and protect sufficient quantities for reclaiming the site. This should include replacing as much newly- <br />stripped topsoil on areas in final reclamation as possible, to either enhance the revegetation or to reduce the bond. <br />The first topsoil stripped from Phase I was stockpiled along the west edge of that phase. That linear berm was placed such <br />that its west toe is at the highway right-of-way fenceline land permit boundary line) and the east toe is at the top of the <br />pi[ highwall slope. The approved plan called for leaving a 20-foot wide unexcavated bench between the berm and the <br />shoulder of the slope for equipment access. There is no room for the topsoil to slump to the west and still remain within <br />the permit boundary; there is no room for it to slump to the east and still protect the slope; and removing it during <br />reclamation will be complicated due to lack of operating room. New topsoil berms being constructed in Phase IV should <br />not crowd the permit boundary, and the highwall shoulder should not crowd the toe of the topsoil berm. Following prior <br />practices may result in violations for offsite damage, problems from degradation of topsoil, or simply higher reclamation <br />costs. <br />The permit requires that topsoil in stockpiles for more than one year be revegetated to protect it from erosion and weeds. <br />This has not been carried out conscientiously on the site in the past, and the operator has been reminded several times <br />that grass should be planted and the annual weeds treated. One of the reasons for inadequate vegetative cover is that <br />stockpile sideslopes are too steep to hold grass seed or moisture; another reason is neglect. This must change or <br />reclamation costs will rise, to account for soil more difficult to revegetate and for controlling heavier weed populations. <br />There is a line of trees along the northern permit boundary originally planted to establish a screen. There are at least two <br />dead pine trees in that line, and possibly some dead deciduous trees, though it is hard to determine at this time of year. <br />The operator should inspect the trees and promptly replace the dead ones. <br />The recent annual report mentions the monitoring of an observed noxious weed infestation. There were no noxious weeds <br />observed during this inspection, and the operator present during the inspection had no knowledge of its presence or <br />location. The operator's diligence in monitoring and providing necessary treatment is appreciated. Please provide more <br />information about this condition in future annual reports. <br />The bond on this site is S 150,000, and was calculated in 1994. {t will be reviewed again in the near future, and the new <br />figures will be sent to the operator. Any revisions to the mining and reclamation plans may influence the final figures. <br />Upon notification that a bond increase is required, the operator has 60 days to provide it. <br />There were no other items noted or discussed during this inspection. For all questions or responses to this report, please <br />contact this inspector at the following address or phone: 701 Camino del Rio, Room 125, Durango CO 81301; tel <br />970/247-5193 or fax 970/247-5104. <br />I & E Contact Address cc: Tom Gillis, DMG <br />^ CE <br />NAME Rick Johnson ^ BL <br />OPERATOR United Companies of Mesa County ^ FS <br />STREET PO Box 3609 ^ HW <br />CITY/STATE/ZIP Grand Junction, CO 81502 ^ HMWMD ICH) <br />^ SE <br />^ WOCD ICHI <br />^ OTHER <br />cc: Sprague Mayger, United Companies of Mesa County, PO Box 1909, Montrose, CO 81402 <br />