My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC41110
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC41110
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:45:05 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:19:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
OSM Inspection Report
Inspection Date
4/3/2007
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 9, 2007 <br />Picketwire Processing, LLC <br />C/O Peak Project Management <br />34115 Co. Rd. 20.8 <br />Trinidad, CO 81082 <br />New Elk Mine <br />Special focus evaluations <br />April 3, 2007 <br />Participants: <br />Ron Thompson, Peak Project Management <br />Kent Gorham, Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DBMS) <br />Henry Austin, Office of Surface Mining (OSM) <br />I participated in a two special focus evaluations of the New Elk Mine as indicated above. <br />Weather conditions were mild and ground conditions were dry throughout the permit azea, <br />The 2 special focus evaluations were designed to evaluate recently regraded lands (regraded <br />during the 2006 evaluation year of July, 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006); and to evaluate <br />compliance with the post mining topography approved in the DBMS mining and reclamation <br />plan. These evaluations were also designed to evaluate offsite impacts and reclamation success <br />respectively. We found that there were no offsite impacts from the recently regraded and <br />reclaimed acreage on the permit area (surface water runoff control is operating in compliance <br />with the approved mining and reclamation plan; we found that the recently regraded lands were <br />reclaimed in accordance with the approved backfilling and grading plan and reclamation <br />schedule, and that the post mining topography was stable and completed as approved in the <br />mining and reclamation plan. <br />We determined the 2 evaluations applied to the reclaimed West Mine area; 2003 reclamation at <br />the S W coal stockpile; the development waste pile; and post mining topography evaluation only <br />of the former pond 5 area and the reclaimed area east of pond 5. <br />We reviewed Maps 14, 16, and 17, Surface Water Control Plan for the West Portal, Post Mining <br />Land Use of the West Portal, and Post Mining Topography. We began the evaluation to the <br />reclaimed West Portal and worked our way back northeast from there. <br />The West Portal is reclaimed as approved and stable after this First surface water runoff season. <br />This entire area was pre law disturbance, and the operators have done a good job of blending the <br />reclaimed slopes into adjacent undisturbed areas and protecting the reclaimed areas where offsite <br />drainages enter reclaimed slopes. All diversion ditches and berms were stable and functional, and <br />the containment pond was dry. This area meets ap rop ved Post mining topogr~hy and no surface <br />water problems were noted. There is a silt fence below the reclaimed are that needs to be <br />maintained. The West Portal fan area remains to be reclaimed. Several concrete culvert sections <br />remain to be removed from the reclaimed area. One large diameter cmp remains to be removed <br />from a former roadway. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.