My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC33859
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC33859
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:36:13 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:43:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
5/24/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made during the <br />inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection and the facts or <br />evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />and seeds) in the live handled topsoil. There are a high number of aspen sprouts in the <br />north half of the fenced area, which is delineated in the "Aspen Study Schematic" diagram <br />in Appendix 22- 3 as the "Normal Topsoil" treatment. There are comparatively few aspen <br />sprouts in the south half of the fenced area, which is delineated on the diagram as <br />"Modified Topsoil". Roy Karo, who supervised the soil salvage and placement operations <br />associated with the study plot location, indicated that the diagram was in error, and that the <br />soil treatments were actually opposite to the locations indicated on the diagram. In <br />addition, individual planted aspen trees that are the subject of the irrigation experiment are <br />more closely spaced, such that the treatment "blocks" take up significantly less space <br />within the fenced area than indicated by the schematic diagram. <br />A minor revision will need to be submitted, to properly amend the schematic diagram in <br />Appendix 223, to correspond to the actual plot layout. <br />The fenced aspen/shrub establishment area on the eastern ridgeline was observed to have a <br />relatively large depression in the center portion of the planting, which had not previously <br />been apparent. At the time of the inspection, there was a pool of standing water several <br />inches deep in the depression. It is possible that a number of the aspens within the area of <br />standing water will not survive if the ponding persists, due to lack of oxygen in the <br />saturated soil. Aspens adjacent to the ponding area will likely benefit from the additional <br />soil moisture. While some aspens may be lost, it would appear that the majority of the <br />trees will benefit, and there would appear to be potential for the establishment of species <br />adapted to high soil moisture conditions within the depression area. For these reasons, it is <br />recommended that further grading to establish positive drainage not be undertaken at <br />present. This area was seeded with the shrub/forb mix, in addition to being planted with <br />large nursery grown aspen saplings (from a Routt or White River National Forest seed <br />source), and seedling shrubs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.