Laserfiche WebLink
• (Page 21 • <br />MINE ID p OR PROSPECTING ID rY M-99-058 <br />INSPECTION DATE 613/99 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />This pre-operation inspection was performed by the Division as a result of a new 110 permit application which was <br />submitted to the Division. The operator was contacted about the inspection and was present throughout the inspection. <br />In addition, Joel Blumenthal, representing OMYA (the underlying landowner) was present throughout the inspection, and <br />a former quarry worker, Roger Ball, arrived after the inspection had begun and was present during the final portion of the <br />inspection. <br />The inspection included surface and underground observations, pre-existing permitted disturbance, pre-law (historic) <br />disturbance, and areas which have not been disturbed by mining. <br />The proposed permit area lies in large part on the footprint of the existing, still-permitted operation of Colorado Yule Marble <br />Company, though there is not perfect overlap of the two permit areas' boundaries. The proposed permit area does not <br />include the 3-acre access road up to the portal area, which was constructed by CYMC for their operation. The new <br />operation will use this road, but the landowner wishes the road to remain unreclaimed. The issue of performing road <br />maintenance, while not contributing to downslope disturbance, will be an issue to explore with the applicant. (Downslope <br />disturbance has the potential to affect areas outside the claims owned by OMYA. These areas are within the road <br />easement of Gunnison County or owned by the adjoining owners, Kim and Steve McIntyre.) <br />The existing waste dump below the portal extends down to Yule Creek. The permit boundary of the existing (CYMC) permit <br />does not eMend down that far, and all material placed below that boundary under their operations may be offsite damage <br />(possible violation for offsite damage will be determined by the Board at an upcoming hearingl. The proposed boundary <br />of the new operation will likewise not extend to the creek, though there will have to be greater monitoring to ensure more <br />careful dump material placement under the new operation. The new boundary markers must be visible and maintained for <br />the life of the new operation. Any new sloughing and rolling material which reaches offsite areas under the new permitted <br />operation will therefore be immediately apparent. <br />The existing dump slope may or may not be completely stable. It appears that at least the toe of the pile should be <br />reworked for the future stability of upslope portions, since the upper portions will be affected as future quarrying is carried <br />out. This may involve careful placement of the material present to a "constructed" buttress of the toe of the dump slope. <br />This will also act to clear a short portion of the foot trail that crosses this area. Additional work on the slope, but within <br />the permit area should include constructing a sediment control structure (the former one was destroyed during dumping <br />of material by CYMCI. Such discharge control may help with stabilizing the dump slope material. <br />At the portal area, the existing generator trailer is still present, and the generator was operating. The diesel tank was still <br />present, and still placed in the membrane-lined containment structure. The new operator should inspect the membrane <br />regularly for weathering or photo-degradation, or tears due to falling material. (It might be advisable to maintain onsite <br />some fuel- or oil-absorbing clean up materials, given the steep topography and proximity to the creek.) The fuel tank <br />supplies fuel to the trailer via a buried line, with external valve under the trailer. Ilt was this valve that was intentionally <br />used to leak fuel at the site in 1995.) The buried line is not subject to damage. The possibility of fuel leaks has been <br />reduced by use of a small tank inside the locked trailer, which is filled for times when mine personnel are not present. <br />The same access portal will be used to enter the quarry. It was closed by a locked gate. Underground structures to be <br />used in the operation include equipment storage and service shop areas, fluid storage, and water sumps. Fluids kept in <br />drums are racked with drip trays and located so that all spills are contained in a depression in the rock floor. There were <br />two water sumps, both full. Deaatering was occurring via a system of pumps and lines leading up to and out old portal <br />A3. Discharge from the line was routed down the gentle Swale at the head of the waste dump area. Discharge water <br />leaves the mine clarified, but apparently picks up marble sediments in the waste dump prior to entering the creek. The <br />discharge location should be changed or sediment structure built. <br />The new lands to be permitted extend south from the existing permit limit. These areas, south of portal 713, will include <br />the outcrop slope, exploration portal k5, the upper reaches of the clearing in the (above mentioned) gentle Swale, and a <br />portion of the timber east of the Swale. The Swale area will become the new upper end of the waste dump. <br />