Laserfiche WebLink
- 11 - <br />`-,.,,J <br />` tions. It was verified statistically that the tScClane and Hunger respective <br />communities were not significantly different in terms of vegetative productiv- <br />ity within the bounds of each vegetative community. Data from the McClane and <br />Munger sites were combined (within communities and between sites), and it was <br />determined that the combined data met confidence level requirements. <br />Due to [he small area of disturbance at the ifcClane site, the CMLRD has deter- <br />mined that premine productivity and premine cover data may be applied as rec- <br />lamation success criteria. It was also determined that the productivity data <br />for the reference areas for the McClave Canyon vegetative communities did not <br />meet sample adequacy requirements and required stipulation (see preferred <br />alternative section). <br />The applicant has not demonstrated that adequate woody plant density sampling <br />has taken place at the McClave Canyon site and required stipulation (see pre- <br />ferred alternative section.) <br />The applicant has proposed a .variance from baseline woody plant densities for <br />the greasewood shrubland. and xhe::shaasrale shzubland, but:-:has: not provided <br />yustification for the proposed stocking level, and is therefore stipulated _ <br />~z•:.: `" ' (see preferred alternative section). - .-- <br />-_ -fie pdrmittee has measured- species diversity._in_terms, .of species richness and <br />species equitability but has not proposed a means to evaluate revegetation <br />success in terms of species diversity. <br />:-±-s: ClII.RD is concerned with the. ability of Salt Creek Mining Company to reclaim ~:~:,.--: <br />~~ the area given the low annual precipitation and subsequently stipulated it for - <br />the compliance. <br />- It has determSnedLthat no threatened or endangered species of plants exist at <br />the McClave Canyon site, based. an information Supplied by the 'applicant. - <br />Fish and. Wildlife _. _. - -., -. <br />Cl1LRD has consulted with Division of Wildlife personnel who are familiar with <br />the area. Both agencies agree that there is little potential for adverse ef- <br />fects of the mine on wildlife since nearly all of the anticipated surface dis- - <br />turhance has occurred and a very limited area is affected. <br />Backfilling and Grading <br />Because the mine is an underground mine, only a limited area of surface dis- <br />turbance will require backfilling and grading. <br />All portals and the sediment pond will be backfilled. The coal seam will be <br />completely covered with backfillcd mateYial. Drainage viii be restored to ap- <br />proxi~ate pre-mining conditions. <br />~! If underground development waste is generated during mining i[ vill'be retaln- <br />j!-~ ed in [he mine workings. <br />