My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC28057
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC28057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:31:38 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:14:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
7/20/2004
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i,- .. <br />r ~ ~ 1 <br />_. r ~~ <br />a > <br />*: ., •~ <br />.. ~F <br />~S ~^-M'yLam,' '~L N f~i~-i. ~.. 1 _ ~• <br />Revegetatio <br />.~,c- r .• .,: - ~„3 <br />~i <br />Recurrent and abundant rainfall has resulted in vigorous growth on the reclaimed areas. <br />Along with a compliment of annual weeds, seeded species are rapidly becoming established. <br />Drill rows from seeding efforts are obvious due to grasses and fortis sprouting up to one foot <br />above the ground. Yellow sweet clover, sunflowers, kochia make up the majority of the <br />annual weeds. Wheatgrasses, brome, vetch, and alfalfa make up the majority of the grass <br />and forb plants at this time. Shrub transplant mortality is estimated as low at this time. <br />Some disruption of the rabbit guards on many of the transplants would indicate grazing <br />activity, likely by elk or deer. Transplant species identified include ponderosa pine, cedar, <br />skunk bush sumac, and mountain mahogany, in compliance with the approved plan. Areas <br />where transplants were observed are in compliance with the approved transplant locations <br />as shown on Map 33, Southfield Reclamation Plan. <br />4 <br />tivdroloaic Balance <br />Pond 5 was holding a small amount of water in the bottom. The primary spillway appeared in <br />good condition. Pond 4 was holding a similar amount of water. Its embankment appeared <br />normal with no problems observed. Silt fence was observed and appeared to be functioning <br />as designed east of Pond 4 and at the Monarch fan reclaimed area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.