My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC26722
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC26722
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:30:40 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:06:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
6/24/2004
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br />and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />borrow area. However, initial seeding results at the two areas are very different. <br />Vegetation on the soil borrow area is dominated by annual weeds (primarily Russian <br />thistle and kochia). Seeded vegetation is limited to a few scattered shrubs and half <br />shrubs, and a few clumps of grass. As with the South Fan area, cattle appear to have <br />concentrated in this area earlier in the spring. Unless conditions change appreciably by <br />next growing season, it would appear that reseeding may be warranted. Unless grazing <br />can otherwise be controlled, fencing may be warranted as well. <br />Whitetop weed patches in the vicinity appear to have been effectively sprayed earlier in <br />the spring. A small number of Russian knapweed plants was noted along the western <br />boundary of the area, a short distance south of the main reconstructed channel. The <br />plants were chopped to prevent seed dispersal, but will likely sprout from the roots this <br />fall and if so, the new growth should be sprayed. <br />0 B"Substation Site -The small parcel was seeded in November 2002. The rocky side <br />slope portion of the area (borehole road location) exhibits good establishment of various <br />shrubs and haltshrubs, and pockets of cool season grasses. The relatively flat area <br />where the electrical substation was located is still dominated by annual forbs, but a <br />number of seeded shrubs and grasses have become established. <br />Noah Decline Site -The major portion of the site was initially seeded in fall 1992, with <br />a water pipeline corridor through the site reseeded in November 2000. The older <br />seeded areas generally support a moderately dense stand of fourwing saltbush and <br />greasewood, with understory dominated by cheatgrass and other weedy annual <br />grasses. In most areas, perennial grasses are sparse and there are few forbs or half <br />shrubs. The 2000 seeded corridor supports good numbers of shrubs (mostly rubber <br />rabbitbrush and fourwing saltbush, along with lower numbers of greasewood and big <br />sagebrush). The corridor also supports a higher component of perennial grasses than <br />the surrounding area, mostly cool season species, with a lesser annual grass <br />component. These areas will be sampled by the operator later this year, and the <br />associated monitoring report will need to include assessment of the need for remedial <br />measures if data indicates likely problems with meeting success standards. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.