Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• iii iiiiiii~iiiiiiiii • <br />~ 1399 <br />Egvirory-~eqt, Iryc. <br />LARRY E. O~BRIAN <br />PR[!IDlRT <br /> <br />June 13, 1983 <br />.1UN 13 1983 <br />Mined Land Reclamation il"-~Idk'D LAND RECLAMATIOfJ <br />1313 Sherman Street , Room 4230 ~~ Of Natufal ReSOLiCBs <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Attention Dir. Peter V. O'Connor <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Gentlemen: <br />9988 WEST 80TH AVENUE <br />AR VADA~COLORADO 80004 <br />303-423-7297 <br />Re Re Albert Frei & Sons, Inc. - Silt Pit <br />D7LR File No. 81-202 <br />Written Response to Inspection Report, April 4, 1983 <br />In mid-April we responded to the inspection report by telephone <br />outlining our reasons for delaying our written response. We <br />are now in a position to respond in writing and the following is <br />a review of observations of importance contained in the inspec- <br />tion report. <br />1. The operator does not consider that mining has been <br />terminated. Mining may have slowed to a feeble amount due to <br />a lack of demand, but the operation has not been terminated. <br />2. Rock handling systems on both sides of the river have been <br />removed because they were needed elsewhere. The river crossing <br />conveyor itself is intact. The conveyor is scheduled for removal <br />by September 30, 1983. The operator expects to use it to move <br />soil material to the north side of the river. <br />3. Economic conditions have prevented the completion of the <br />conveyor system to Stage I. Thus construction has been stopped <br />and the system dismantled. D4ining has been moved back to the <br />vicinity of the processing operation since conveyor transport is <br />not now feasible. <br />4. Yes. <br />5. Yes. <br />6. Yes. <br />