Laserfiche WebLink
i r• • <br /> <br />PAGE 3 <br />advised to complete remedial actions to_.ensure that the structure <br />-will safely pass the design event should a disc=barge occur. <br />The inspecti~:n continued with observations ~~f the east perimeter <br />ditch. That ditch was also found to be intact although as in the case <br />of structures described above there is an abundance of annual weeds <br />lining the channel. <br />The inspection also included observations of the face-up area - <br />portals and vent fans. Tkie two portals and vent fan immediately above <br />the facilities were found to be intact and sufficiently secured. <br />However, an additional vent fan located above the offi~.e was n~~t <br />secure at the time of the inspection. The steel d~:or to the vent far. <br />housing was r_~pen and blacked by a small quantity of large sanstone <br />roc E:. The Apex No. ~ Mine, Site Plan Map, Plate 1, dated 3-~ 79 does <br />not depict the structure. It is possible that the fan is part of the <br />old Apex No. 1 Mine and not the responsibility of Sunland Mining <br />Corporation. The Division was ~=onta~:ted on li~/~1/87 tc. ascertain the <br />status of the structure. The issue has not been resolved at this <br />writing. It is possible, depending on the status cif the structure <br />that a TDN will be issued for failure to secure the facility in <br />accordance with Rule 4.3i~.i. <br />